Mandschurosaurus (meaning "lizard from Manchuria") is an extinct genus of hadrosaurids based on material from the Late Cretaceous of China and possibly also the Early Cretaceous of Laos. It was the first dinosaur genus named from China.
Discovery and naming The holotype of M. amurensis (IVP AS coll.), the only valid species within the genus, is based on a poorly preserved and incomplete skeleton collected by Russian scientists in 1914 from the banks of the Amur River, China in a layer of the Maastrichtian-aged Yuliangze Formation and the remains represent a large hadrosaurid. [Russian] The holotype material was initially referred to the genus Trachodon (a nomen dubium) as T. amurense by Riabinin (1925),Riabinin, A.N. (1925). A mounted skeleton of the gigantic reptile Trachodon amurense, nov. sp. Izvest. Geol. Kom. 44(1):1-12. [Russian] but was later reassigned to a new genus by Riabinin (1930).
The holotype of M. laosensis, which is based mainly on an ilium and other fragmentary remains,Ruiz-Omeñaca, J.I. (2006). Restos directos de dinosaurios (Saurischia, Ornithischia) en el Barremiense (Cretácico Inferior) de la Cordillera Ibérica en Aragón (Teruel, España). comes from the Aptian-Albian-aged Grès supérieurs Formation in Laos and was named by Hoffet (1944).J.-H. Hoffet. (1944). Description of the most characteristic bones belonging to Avipelvians from the Senonian of Lower Laos. Minutes of the Sessions of the Council for Scientific Research of Indochina 1944:179-186 A mounted skeleton based on the holotype of M. amurensis is on display at the Central Geological and Prospecting Museum in St. Petersburg, although much of the skeleton is plaster.
Description While the holotype of M. amurensis would have measured long and tall, the largest specimen would have measured long and tall and weighed around 1.5-2 metric tons (3,300-4,400 pounds).
It had a broad, flat beak and a long tail, similar to related hadrosaurs.
Classification There has been some debate regarding the validity of this genus. Brett-Surman (1979) first considered it a nomen dubium, though some later workers have continued to see it as a valid taxon (Chapman et Brett Surman, 1990,Chapman R. et Brett-Surman M. K. (1990). Morphometric observations on hadrosaurid ornithopods. in Carpenter K. et Currie, P. J. (eds.), Dinosaur Systematics: Perspectives and Approaches, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 163-177. for example). Most recently, Horner et al. (2004) listed the type species as a nomen dubium in the second edition of The Dinosauria.Horner J., Weishampel D. B., et Forster C. A. (2004). Chapter Twenty: Hadrosauridae. in The Dinosauria (2nd edition), Weishampel D. B., Dodson P., and Osmólska H., editors. University of California Press.
Over the years, three species have been placed within this genus: Mandschurosaurus amurensis, M. mongoliensis, and M. laosensis. Brett-Surman (1979) considered M. mongoliensis a distinct genus, which he named Gilmoreosaurus and Horner et al. (2004) considered M. laosensis a nomen dubium; This leaves only Riabinin's original species, M. amurensis, as a possibly valid taxon.
Within Ornithopoda, Mandschurosaurus is most often placed within Hadrosauridae as a nomen dubium.
Gallery
See also Timeline of hadrosaur research
References