The Beer Hall Putsch trial (also known as the Hitler trial or Hitler-Ludendorff trial) was the criminal proceeding against Adolf Hitler and other leaders of the failed coup attempt of 9 November 1923. The trial was held from 26 February to 1 April 1924 before the Bavarian People's Court in Munich.
The conduct of the trial by presiding judge Georg Neithardt, who imposed far milder sentences than prescribed by law, was widely considered a judicial scandal even at the time. Hitler used the proceedings to portray himself as a selfless politician motivated by patriotic goals. This increased his popularity in anti-democratic and anti-republican circles both within and outside Bavaria and helped him later emerge as the undisputed leader of the Völkisch movement.
Hitler's arrest After the failed coup attempt of 9 November 1923, Hitler fled Munich. He was given shelter by Helene Hanfstaengl, whose husband Ernst Hanfstaengl had also been involved in the putsch, at her villa in Uffing am Staffelsee. The following day, physician Walter Schultze came to the villa with an assistant in order to reset Hitler's shoulder, which had been dislocated during the events in Munich.
On Sunday, 11 November, at 16:20, First Lieutenant Rudolf Belleville, the local commander of the Bavarian State Police in Weilheim in Oberbayern, received a telephone order to arrest Hitler at the Hanfstaengl villa. In Uffing, Belleville, accompanied by ten state police officers and a gendarme, first searched the villa of Hanfstaengl's mother, Katharina, for an hour and a half. Only after a direct telephone call with Helene Hanfstaengl did they proceed to her villa. According to Hanfstaengl's memoirs, Helene then snatched the pistol from Hitler, which he had already held to his temple intending suicide.
Hitler was arrested without resistance by Belleville, with whom he was personally acquainted. The detachment drove back to Weilheim with Hitler, and at 10:45 the next day, Hitler, accompanied by 39 guards, was delivered to the Landsberg Fortress Prison.
Preparation of the trial Hitler was placed in cell no. 7, where Anton Graf von Arco auf Valley had previously been imprisoned. On the second day of his imprisonment, he was interrogated by assistant prosecutor Hans Ehard. Hitler only agreed to speak after the minute-taker had left the room. He denied committing high treason, arguing that the "crime" of the November Revolution remained unpunished. He claimed that Gustav von Kahr, Otto von Lossow, and Hans von Seißer had been preparing the overthrow with him for months. Ehard's report of this interview from memory formed the basis of the indictment.
Jurisdiction for the high treason trial would normally have lain with the Reich Court in Leipzig. However, the proceedings instead took place before the Bavarian People's Court at the Munich I Regional Court, a deliberate case of perversion of justice accepted by the Bavarian government, as this special court was by then unconstitutional.Otto Gritschneder, Bewährungsfrist für den Terroristen Adolf H. : Der Hitler-Putsch und die bayerische Justiz, p. 16. Four separate proceedings were initiated: 1) against Hitler and the other leaders of the putsch, 2) against the assault squad (Stoßtrupp), 3) against Karl Beggel and Hans Knauth for the theft of banknotes from printing works, and 4) against those responsible for the raid on the St. Anna Monastery.
The trial
The high treason trial began on the morning of 26 February 1924 in the main reading room of the Infantry School. Present were 368 witnesses, correspondents from around the world, and hundreds of spectators with reserved seats. Two battalions of the state police cordoned off Mars and Blutenburg streets with barbed wire and Spanish riders.
The ten defendants were Adolf Hitler, Erich Ludendorff, Heinz Pernet, Friedrich Weber, Hermann Kriebel, Ernst Röhm, Ernst Pöhner, Wilhelm Frick, Wilhelm Brückner and Robert Wagner. Rudolf Hess had initially gone into hiding and later surrendered to the court; Hermann Göring had fled abroad.
The prosecutor was Ludwig Stenglein, assisted by Hans Ehard and second prosecutor Martin Dresse. The court presidency was held by the right-wing nationalist Georg Neithardt, with judges August Leyendecker and the lay judges (Schöffen) Philipp Herrmann, Christian Zimmermann, and Leonhard Beck. Hitler's defense attorney was lawyer Lorenz Roder. The indictment described Hitler as "the soul of the whole enterprise". Neithardt arbitrarily replaced an incriminating record of Ludendorff's interrogation with another stating that Ludendorff had known nothing about the coup preparations; accordingly, Ludendorff was not held in custody.
Neithardt only swore in the witnesses for the defense, not those for the prosecution. The defendants pleaded "not guilty". Although the indictment was formally "against Ludendorff et al.", Hitler, who appeared wearing his Iron Cross First Class on his lapel, assumed sole responsibility for the putsch. With applause from spectators, he declared there could be no high treason against the "traitors of 1918". He accused Kahr, Lossow, and Seißer of betrayal, claiming they had planned the coup with him for weeks but then turned against him and the German people.
The witnesses Kahr (an aspiring dictator),Heinrich August Winkler: Geschichte des Westens, Die Zeit der Weltkriege 1914-1945. C.H. Beck, Munich 2011 (3rd edition 2016), ISBN 978-3-406-59236-2, p. 313. Lossow (commander of the Bavarian civil war army),Kai Uwe Tapken: Historical Lexicon of Bavaria – Reichswehr in Bavaria, accessed 13 August 2017. both by then dismissed, and Seißer were harshly attacked by Hitler. The presiding judge mostly allowed Hitler to interrogate them repeatedly in the manner of a prosecutor and discredit their statements, forcing the prosecutor to defend them. Seißer accused Hitler of sole responsibility for the enterprise, thereby confirming Hitler's own claim. The accused Pöhner stated that the institutions and laws of the Weimar Republic were not binding on him. Prosecutor Hans Ehard appeared to be working seriously towards a conviction during these proceedings, but his objections and motions were repeatedly overruled.
Twenty-five days were taken up by witness testimony and discussions, from which the public and press were largely excluded "for security reasons". On 27 March 1924, the defendants were allowed to give final statements. Hitler first argued that, despite his humble origins, he felt called to lead a people. He then accused Ebert and Scheidemann of treason and proclaimed his belief in a future reconciliation with those "who shot at us". Finally, he denied the court's right to pronounce a guilty verdict:
Prosecutor Stenglein combined his sentencing recommendation with many words of praise for Hitler.
The lay judges
The three lay judges at the People's Court who participated were Leonhard Beck,Leonhard Maximilian Michael Beck (born 6 May 1867 in Schwandorn) was a bookbinder's assistant and auxiliary policeman, resident in Munich since December 1885 (last at Schmellerstraße 32/0) and moved to Mittenwalde in September 1943. He was married to Anna Frank (born 31 January 1863 in Oberviechtach). Philipp Hermann,Franz Rudolph Philipp Hermann (born 21 October 1865 in Nuremberg; died 10 January 1930 in Munich) was a clerk and insurance official. He had been resident in Munich since October 1886 (last at Tumblingerstraße 7/I) and was married to Margaret Förtsch (born 15 July 1863 in Stadtsteinach). and Christian Zimmermann.Christian Anton Zimmermann, originally (until 1886) Fratton (born 18 April 1858 in Tegernsee) was an insurance inspector for Munich Re. He lived in Munich since 1887 (last at Humboldtstraße 9/3) and was married to Maria Hierl (born 25 June 1866 in Munich). According to research by Andreas Stenglein, these three men played the "most absurd role" by informing the presiding judge at the trial's outset that they would only agree to convict Hitler if the sentence were suspended. Since the court required a four-vote majority for decisions, the presiding judge was compelled to compromise to avoid the trial's collapse. Otherwise, the case would have been transferred to the competent Leipzig Reich Court, which the Bavarian government desperately wanted to avoid. Consequently, Hitler received, as the lay judges desired, only the minimum sentence of five years with a promise of probation, not the eight years requested by the prosecutor. Thus, the three lay judges, "like no one else," according to Stenglein, acted as "key figures" in paving Hitler's path to power nine years later. Lothar Gruchmann similarly judged: "Decisive for the court's decision to grant probation along with the verdict was the attitude of the lay judges." Lay judges Philipp Hermann and Leonhard Beck confirmed this in a letter of 6 July 1924 to the Munich I Public Prosecutor's Office: "Only on the general condition that probation was granted, and specifically promised for Hitler [...] could the lay judges bring themselves to the extraordinarily difficult decision to agree to the guilty verdict."Lothar Gruchmann (ed.): Der Hitler-Prozess 1924: Wortlaut der Hauptverhandlung vor dem Volksgericht München, Part 1, p. 365; also idem: Justiz im Dritten Reich, 2001, p. 42. All three lay judges never joined the NSDAP and were not subjected to denazification proceedings after 1945.Andreas Stenglein: The Hitler Trial 1924. Ludwig Stenglein, prosecutor in the Hitler trial 1924, and Hans Ehard, his right-hand man.
The verdict Proceedings against the main perpetrators
On 1 April 1924, the verdict was to be announced. At ten o'clock, the defendants arrived at the Infantry School and first posed for photographers. The officers wore splendid uniforms; Ludendorff and Kriebel even wore Pickelhaubes.
In the overcrowded hall, Neithardt read the verdict, decided by a vote of four to one. The reasoning cited the defendants' "purely patriotic spirit and noblest will". The deaths of the four Bavarian policemen during the putsch were not mentioned. Except for Ludendorff, all defendants were found guilty, though Brückner, Röhm, Pernet, Wagner, and Frick were convicted only of aiding and abetting high treason.
Ludendorff protested his acquittal, declaring:
This statement triggered stormy cheers of "Heil!". Pre-trial detention was deducted from the sentences, so Frick, Röhm, Wagner, and Brückner were released on probation. Hitler, Weber, Kriebel, and Pöhner were sentenced to the minimum penalty of five years' Festungshaft (fortress detention) plus a fine of 200 gold marks. After six months, the sentence could be converted to probation for good behavior. The mandatory expulsion of Hitler under § 9 para. 2 of the Law for the Protection of the Republic was not applied, citing that Hitler considered himself German, had served four and a half years in the German Army during the war, and had distinguished himself through bravery.
In the courtroom, cries of "Bravo!" and "Heil!" rang out. The prisoners received bouquets of flowers. When they appeared at the window of the guardroom before their transport to Landsberg, the crowd on Blutenburg Street broke into cheers.
On 20 December 1924, Hitler and Kriebel were released from Landsberg on probation; Pöhner and Weber, who began their imprisonment later, were released in the spring of 1925.
The subordinate proceedings
Following the trial against Hitler, Ludendorff, and the other ringleaders, further criminal proceedings related to the failed coup were held before the Munich People's Court in April and May 1924.