Fischer v United States, 529 U.S. 667 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court case that ruled that the scope of the federal bribery statute 18 U.S.C. , which applied to organizations that received "benefits in excess of $10,000 under a Federal program", included funds received through Medicare.
Opinion of the Court In a 7-2 opinion written by Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, the Court held that, "The government has a legitimate and significant interest in prohibiting financial fraud or acts of bribery being perpetrated upon Medicare providers.... Fraudulent acts threaten the program's integrity...."FISCHER V. UNITED STATES (99-116) 529 U.S. 667 (2000). Cornell Legal Information Institute
Thomas' dissent
Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Antonin Scalia, argued that Medicare funds did not constitute bribery as the only people who ultimately received the benefits were patients.
References
External links