The coinage of Capua concerns coins minted in ancient Capua, a city in ancient Campania, corresponding to present-day Santa Maria Capua Vetere. The city was located on the Appian Way and was the most important in the area, probably the largest center in the Italian peninsula after Rome.

During the Second Punic War, in 216 B.C. after the Battle of Cannae, the city chose to side with the Carthaginians. It was during this period that coins were minted bearing the city's name, KAPU, with letters of the Oscan alphabet and with mirror script.

After Hannibal's departure, the city returned to Roman occupation, permanently ceasing minting and later using Roman coinage centered on the denarius.

Capua, unlike other communities in the area, had not previously issued coinage because, after its deditio to Rome in 343 B.C., in order to defend itself against the Samnites, it had become to all intents and purposes Roman and therefore did not use coins of its own.

Traditionally numismatists treat the coins of Capua within the framework of Greek coinage.Eckhel: Doctrina numorum veterum.

Cataloging There is a study by Jean-Baptiste Giard, published in 1965 among the proceedings of the International Congress of Numismatics held in Rome in 1961. The text is scarcely available and therefore not generally used in auction catalogs. It is cited as Giard, Monnaie, followed by the number.

One text used is that of Rutter et al., Historia Numorum Italy, which deals with all the ancient non-Roman coinage of the Italian peninsula. The coins of Capua are numbered 479 to 510. In this text the references are to Giard, given as "Giard, 'Capoue' and number."

Also used is one published by Arthur Sambon, a French scholar, entitled Les monnaies antiques de l'Italie, and published in Paris in 1903. The book deals, despite the title, with only part of ancient Italy, namely central Italy and Campania. The coins pertinent to Capua are numbered from 1021 to 1052. Also considered among the Capuan (or Campanian) coins are coins that according to more recent authors are perhaps not attributable to this city.

Other sources for cataloging are the Sylloge Nummorum Graecorum. Used are generally the most recent or most widely available ones, such as that of the American Numismatic Society, that of Copenhagen, and that of France. Also used for bronzes is the Sylloge of the Morcom Collection, a collection of bronzes from the Greek West, located in Great Britain. In the catalogs there is an abbreviated indication of the Sylloge, e.g., "ANS," "Cop.," "France," or "Morcom" followed by the number of the coin depicted.

Historical context

The city of Capua stood on the site of present-day Santa Maria Capua Vetere and was considered one of the largest cities in ancient Italy, after Rome. The city, founded by the Etruscans in the first quarter of the fifth century BC,Strabo, Geography, V (Italy), 4.3. was located on the Appian WayStrabo, Geography, VI (Italy), 3.7. and was the most important one in the area.Strabo, Geography, V (Italy), 4.10.

In the 4th century BC, the city became the object of the aims of the Samnites, who laid siege to it. Capua then sent an embassy to Rome requesting its protection, but the Roman Senate, which had previously concluded a treaty of non-belligerence with the Samnites, was forced to reject this proposal. The ambassadors of the Campanian city, moved by desperation, then decided to surrender the entire city, its inhabitants, fields, possessions and everything of theirs, into the hands of Rome (deditio), so as to force it to commit itself morally to its defense against the Samnite aggressor. In this way the city thus became Roman and forced Rome to agree to intervene in its defense, initiating the first Samnite war. This was in 343 BC.

With the Second Punic War, Capua, along with cities such as Atella, Calatia, and others, came over to Hannibal's side in 216 B.C. after the Battle of Cannae. The Carthaginian army settled in the city and turned it into an important military and political outpost. As the ruling political class and the Capuan population supported Hannibal's military campaign, a series of bronze coins were minted. In 212 and 211 BC. Capua suffered two long sieges by the Romans, so much so that Hannibal, in an attempt to relieve the Roman pressure, pushed his army as far as under the walls of Rome, in the area of Porta Collina. After Hannibal's departure in 211 B.C., the city was finally conquered by the Romans, and many Campanian senators, that is, from Capua, took their own lives with poison rather than fall captive into the hands of the enemy. Others, despite the contrary opinion of the Roman Senate, were killed by Gnaeus Fulvius at Cales and Teanum Sidicinum.

Monetary context Coins in the name of Capua (KAPU in the Oscan alphabet) were minted during the Second Punic War in one of the few cities in Italy that decided to ally with Hannibal. The context is that of Punic coinage in Italy during that war.HN Italy, p. 9

Shortly before the outbreak of the Second Punic War, in 218 B.C., gold and silver coinage from the Greek colonies on the Italian peninsula had ceased, and finds indicate a significant penetration of Rome's silver, linked to increasing production, as far as southern Campania.

With the arrival of Hannibal, some communities, having broken relations with Rome, minted coinage in all three metals to finance their expenses. In Campania these communities were, besides Capua, the cities of Atella and Calatia. These cities minted coins with indications of value in the same manner as was in use in Rome and, earlier, in the other centers of central Italy. Of the three cities, only Capua issued precious metal coins.

At the same time Tarentum and Metapontum, which had not minted since about 240 BC, also began minting again. These centers struck silver coins with a monetary foot similar to the Punic shekel.

In southern Italy there were other issues: the coinage of the Bruttians, that of the Lucanians, Petelia and Cosentia. In addition to these there are the Punic issues of southwestern Italy, the location of which is still being studied.

There is also a series of coins with the legend ΚΑΜΠΑΝΟΣ, which in the past some scholars have linked to Capua, but whose location is uncertain. These are two staters with the man-headed bull, that is, a bull with a human face, on the reverse and bearing on the obverse, the first, the head of a female deityHN Italy, 476; Sambon, 771 and the other Athena.HN Italy, 476; Sambon, 765-770 This coinage is dated to the period 415-405 BCE.HN Italy, p. 64

Numismatics Eckhel in Doctrina numorum veterumDoctrina numorum veterum, I, Vienna, 1792. I, I, p. 110. shows doubts about the attribution to Capua of the coins with the legend ΚΑΜΠΑΝΟΣ by treating them separately; he assigns with certainty to the city the coins with Oscan legends.

Julius Friedländer, in his text devoted to coins with legends in the Oscan alphabet, attributes one silver and many bronze coins to Capua. He also considers coins with ROMA and ROMANO legends "without doubt" to have been minted in Capua. He makes no dating assumptions for bronzes with Oscan legends.Friedländer: Die oskischen Münzen, p. 7.

B.V. HeadHistoria Numorum: Campania. attributes Capua - while expressing uncertainty - to Roman-Campanian coinage, the Greek-style coins struck in the name of Rome. Head also divides the bronze coins into two periods: one group of coins he considers to be prior to 268 B.C., the other to be dated after the same date, and only the silver coinage is attributed to the period of the Second Punic War. The anepigraphic coin in electrum with a female Janiform head on the obverse, previously attributed to Capua, is rightly dated to the period when Capua had revolted against Rome, while also noting that there was no reason to attribute it to Capua itself but should be included in the Punic coinage of southern Italy.

Arthur Sambon cites the opinions of some numismatists (Babelon, Lenormant, Millingen, Raoul Rochette, and Mommsen) who attributed the production of the Roman-Campanian coins to Capua.Sambon, p. 389 This attribution was confirmed by Haeberlin in his Die Systematik des ältesten römischen Münzwesen of 1905. Sambon decided to deal exclusively with the coinage with the Oscan legend.Sambon, p. 39 On these coins he notes the contiguity with the coins of the Bruttians and Apulia. On the dating, however, Sambon maintains the hypothesis that these are largely coins minted from the First Punic War and only the electrum coins with the two-faced head on the obverse and Jupiter standing on the quadriga (Sambon 1050, HN Italy 2013), are to be dated during the Second Punic War and before 211 BC, when Capua was reconquered by the Romans.

Rutter et al. in Historia Numorum Italy, date all of Capua's coinage during the Second Punic War, associating it with those of other communities that sided with Hannibal. Two of these communities, Atella and Calatia, were located near Capua. Others included Tarentum, Metapontum, the Lucanians, and the Bruttians. In addition to these Italic and Italiote communities Rutter et al. associate the "Carthaginian coins of southern Italy," a group of coins whose exact place of minting is unclear and which are associated with Hannibal's stay in Italy.

Catalli shares the same opinion and dates the Capua coinage to the Second Punic War, at the same time as the issues of the communities already mentioned.Catalli, p. 126

Coins The coins that are definitely from Capua are those with the name of the city (KAPU) written in the Oscan alphabet with mirror writing, that is, from right to left. Most of these coins are made of bronze and bear an indication of value. There are also some coins whose attribution to Capua is less certain, such as the gold series that seems to use the numismatic foot of the Attic drachma.Catalli, p. 127

Electrum

There are electrum coins, a natural alloy of gold and silver with varying proportions, which had been attributed by some authors to Capua but are now considered within the coinage struck by the Carthaginians in southern Italy during the Second Punic War.HN Italy, pp. 161-162 These are essentially two types: one with a Janiform head and the other with the head of Demeter-Tanit.

The first type (HN Italy 2013) features a Janiform female head crowned with wheat on the obverse, as mentioned above, and the reverse depicts Jupiter, with thunderbolt and scepter, on a quadriga led by Victoria. This coin takes up the types of the Roman quadrigatus.Quadrigatus It has been identified as a Punic coin by GardnerPercy Gardner, Numismatic Chronicle, 1884, pp. 220ff (cited in. HN Italy, p. 161). based on both the lack of legend and the exact correspondence as to weight and title with Carthaginian coins in electrum.

The other type (HN Italy 2014) features on the obverse the head of Demeter-Tanit turned to the left. The deity wears a crown made up of ears of corn; behind the head is sometimes the letter Α (alpha). Tanit was the most important goddess in Carthage and appeared on most Punic coins. The reverse depicts a horse standing or in a walking pose facing to the right. Sometimes there is a symbol (bow) in the exergue. The types and style of this coin are characteristic of the coinage of Carthage.Carthaginian shekel The association of this coin with the previous one is in Robinson NC 1964.E.S.G Robinson, Carthaginian and other South Italian coinages of the Second Punic War, Numismatic Chronicle, 1964, pp. 37-64.

In both cases these are 3/8 shekel pieces, weighing about 2.75 grams.

Gold