The Doctrine of Awakening is a book by Julius Evola, first published as in 1943, and translated into English by H. E. Musson in 1951. The book was based on translations from the Buddhist Pali Canon by Karl Eugen Neumann and . Evola was not a practicing Buddhist, but the topic had personal significance to him, since a passage from the Majjhima Nikaya had dissuaded him from committing suicide in 1922. It was the first of Evola's works to be translated into English.Translator's Foreword
Contents
The Doctrine of Awakening is divided into two main parts. The first part covers the principles of Buddhism, while the second part follows successive stages of Buddhist monastic practice, and takes up the majority of the book's length. Both parts combine summaries of doctrines taken from the Pali Canon with Evola's own analysis.
Part I
Evola begins the book with a discussion of the notion of ascesis, noting that its meaning has diverged from its etymology in the Ancient Greek In the West, ascesis has instead become associated with mortification of the flesh under the influence of Christianity. Evola compares the original meaning of ascesis with the Indian practice of . He argues that eastern forms of ascesis should not be seen with the negative connotations of Christian asceticism. Setting out to discuss an alternative to the prevailing Western view of ascesis, he selects Buddhism, particularly early Buddhism, as an example of an ascetic system that is "in tune with the spirit of Aryan man and yet prevailing in the modern age." He translates "Buddhism" as the "Doctrine of Awakening," stressing that is a title referring to an "Awakened One," not merely the name of the founder of Buddhism.ch. 1 Sulle varietà dell’ascesi "Varieties of Ascesis"
Having set out his intention to discuss Buddhist ascesis in the first chapter, Evola dedicates the second chapter to arguing that Buddhism is Aryan in nature.ch. 2 Arianità della dottrina del risveglio "The Aryan-ness of the Doctrine of Awakening" He notes the appearance of in Pali Buddhist terms including and . Evola believes that this term has "spiritual, aristocratic, and racial significance" in Buddhism that cannot be translated. Evola further argues that Buddhism shares a common origin with other "Aryan" and "Olympian" forms of spirituality such as Platonism, Stoicism and Meister Eckhart's mysticism. According to Evola, the for whom Buddhism was intended were an aristocratic caste opposed both to the native "demoniacal" races conquered by the Indo-Europeans, and to the "plebeian masses" within Indo-European societies. As further evidence, Evola takes the Prince Siddhattha's birth as a Khattiya of the Sakya clan, the 32 attributes of a superior man, comparisons between Buddhist practice and physical battle in Pali texts, and the royal funeral rites performed after the Buddha's death.
The third chapter considers the historical context in which Buddhism arose.ch. 3 Luogo storico della dottrina del risveglio "The Historical Context of the Doctrine of Awakening" Evola begins by expressing his view that "objective" and valuable elements appear in all worthwhile spiritual traditions. He explains that no one tradition can be called original, but each arise from a combination of historical context and elements "rooted in a superindividual reality." Evola divides "pre-Buddhist Indo-Aryan traditions" between the Vedas and the later Brahmana and Upanishads. He argues that the Vedas represent neither a religion nor a philosophy, but a "sacred science." They correspond to the "Olympian-Homeric phase" in Greek culture, when humanity saw itself as being in close contact with the Gods. The Vedas describe humanity entering communion with divinity through sacrificial rites. According to Evola, the Brahmana texts and Upanishads from around the 10th century BC represent developments in the tradition, the Brahmana demonstrating a turn from ritual as direct form of interaction with supersensible forces, to a theological and formalised rite performed by members of a priestly Brahmin caste; while the Upanishads philosophised the concept of the . By the time of the Buddha in the 6th century BC, speculative theology, pantheism, and belief in reincarnation had become prominent, trends Evola identifies as "decedent." Evola states that a distinction did not originally exist between a sacerdotal Brahmin caste, and the warrior and royal castes, and that it was the warrior nobility of the Kshatriya caste who were responsible for reactions against speculative and sacerdotal Brahmanism, through Jainism, Samkhya, and Buddhism. Evola considers Buddhism a revolt against the contemporary Brahamin caste, whose "representatives no longer preserved its dignity and had lost their qualifications." Regarding the problem of caste, Evola stresses that the Buddha recognised the value of the caste system for the majority of society; only the "spiritual apex of the Aryan hierarchy" needed to be revised on the merits of individual cases, so that the true ascetics could be found among the various castes. This is explained through a metaphor from the : "as one who desires fire does not ask the type of wood that in fact produces it, so from any caste may arise an ascetic or an Awakened One." Evola believes that Buddhism remains applicable in the modern day.
The remaining chapters of Part I comment on key doctrines contained in the Pali Canon. Evola describes the doctrine of the or "unanswerable questions" as a means against speculative thought and the "demon of dialectics" in favour of a "superior type or criterion of certainty" acquired through "immediate vision." He likens the acinteyya to Kant's antinomies in Western philosophy.ch. 4 Distruzione del dèmone della dialettica "Destruction of the Demon of Dialectics" He contrasts the Brahmanical doctrine of with the Buddhist doctrines of and impermanence, and likens the Buddhist understanding of samsāra to the Hellenic ideas of the cycle of generation and the wheel of necessity. He then explains the ideas of , , , , , and with reference to the Pali Canon. According to Evola, Buddhism rejects belief in reincarnation, but teaches the existence of an impersonal samsaric continuity in the form of craving. He distinguishes two degrees of "samsāric consciousness," one that is bound to belief in an individual "I," and another wherein awareness stretches out in time and space. He accuses Western commentators of confusing the second kind of samsaric consciousness with "what is really unconditioned and extra-samsaric."ch. 5 La fiamma e la coscienza samsàrica "The Flame and Samsāric Consciousness" Next he explains , and each of the 12 nidanas, considering them as forming both a "samsaric, temporal, and horizontal chain", and at the same time a "transcendental, vertical, and descending series".ch. 6 La genesi condizionata "Conditioned Genesis" He describes the conjoined role of and –serenity and clear perception–in the Buddhist path. Since arousing is the beginning of the process of ascesis, Evola argues that original Buddhism is not universal, but aristocratic in nature. He justifies this view with reference to the , in which the Buddha is reluctant to share his knowledge until he is shown the existence of "beings of a nobler kind" who have the capacity to understand it. In the last chapter of Part I, he reiterates the difference between Christian asceticism and Buddhist forms of renunciation, saying that the former is a painful practice born from resentment, while the latter is detachment brought about by awareness of the contingency of the world. One who follows this "Aryan" kind of renunciation rejects life not through self-mortification, but on the basis that life and death are "inadequate to his real nature."ch. 7 Determinazione delle vocazioni "Determination of the Vocations"
Part II In Part II, starting from Chapter 8, Evola sets out to provide a practical guide to Buddhist ascesis. He first considers the necessary conditions for practice, the first of which is birth as a human being. According to Evola, another condition is being of male sex. He cites the Bahudhātuka Sutta: "It is impossible, it cannot be that a woman should arrive at the full enlightenment of a Buddha, or become a universal sovereign." He then explains the five qualities of the "combatant," taken from the Kaṇṇakatthala Sutta. It is also necessary to remove "vain imaginings" of the past and future and cultivate simplicity in the mind. The first stage of in the ascetic path is pabbajja, "departure" in the literal sense, in which one abandons one's home and becomes a wandering ascetic. However, Evola argues that the core point is to abandon society, companions, and family in favour of solitude and freedom, and that in an internal and symbolical sense, departure might even be more easily achieved in the isolation of modern-day cities than in traditional civilisation.ch. 8 Le qualità del combattente e la "partenza" "The Qualities of the Combatant and the 'Departure'"
Chapter 9 concerns harmful mental processes and the means to defend against them.ch. 9 Difesa e consolidamento "Defence and Consolidation" Evola describes modern civilisation as one in which control over the mind is overlooked, and the focus is on control over external things. Uncontrolled, thought "walks by itself," switching focus from object to object without purpose. This leads to a state of passivity both in idleness and when a person becomes agitated or emotional. This pattern of thought corresponds to samsāric consciousness and must be brought under control, which is only possible through earnestness and interior calm. Following the Evola likens this process to a battle. Evola then lists the methods described in the Vitakka-Santhana Sutta for the removal of distracting thoughts. One must actively attack distractions that appear in the mind: "renounce a tendency or a thought, drive it away, root it out, suffocate it before it grows." Through this effort one gradually attains the four iddhipada.
Chapter 10 covers , or "rightness."ch. 10 Drittura "Rightness" Evola distinguishes sila from mere morality, arguing that it represents a virile "uprightness," that the virtues of sīla are to be understood as "duties to oneself," and that ethical precepts have purely instrumental value in Buddhism. He then comments in detail on each of the five precepts, the five hindrances, and the elements of the Noble Eightfold Path.
Chapter 11 covers ,ch. 10 La presenza siderea. Le ferite si chiudono "Sidereal Awareness: The Wounds Close " whose purpose is "to begin to disengage the central principle of one's own being by means of an objective and detached consideration." Evola discusses the 4 groups of the satipatthāna and their substages in succession: the contemplation of breath, of the parts of the body, of the elements which form the body, and of the decay of the body after death; the contemplation of feelings; the contemplation of the mind; and the contemplation of Dhamma. Evola stresses that the habits of awareness developed through satipatthana should spread to encompass all elements of everyday life. Combined with sila, satipatthana leads to "intimate, unalloyed joy."