The Yamatai Kyushu Theory is the theory that the Yamatai kingdom was located in Kyushu rather than in Honshu, specifically Kinai (now Kinki region), where the capital was located in the Kofun period, as the Yamatai Honshu Theory proposes. The Honshu Theory is currently the dominant theory, based on archaeological findings.

The Yamatai Kyushu theory instead proposes that the original capital of the Yamatai kingdom of Japan was located in the island of Kyushu, and when the Kofun period began, the Yamato Kingship moved its capital east to the Kinai region, first in the Yamato Province (Nara prefecture), then Kyoto in the Yamashiro Province (Kyoto Prefecture).

Overview

In the Edo period, Arai Hakuseki advocated the "Kinai Yamataikoku theory" which suggests that Yamatai was located in Yamato Province, ie. Nara prefecture () in the Kinai, Honshu. Later, Arai advocated a different theory, the "Kyūshū Yamataikoku theory" which says Yamatai-koku was located in "Yamato county (, Yamato-gun)" in Chikugo Province (Fukuoka prefecture, Northern Kyushu) in his book "Foreign Affairs Chronicle".

Since then, the mainstream of academic circles has been divided into two major theories: the "Honshu theory" (supported by Naitō Torajirō et al.) holds that Yamatai-koku was located in Honshu. According to this theory, the Yamatai-koku was essentially continuous with the Yamato Kingship, with its capital in roughly the same region, and the Yamatai-koku transformed into the Yamato Kingship when the Kofun period began. the "Kyushu theory" (supported by Shiratori Kurakichi et al.) holds that Yamatai-koku was located in Kyushu. The Kyūshū theory has itself been divided into two schools. One school insists the "Kyushu Yamatai-koku" moved to the East and became the Imperial House of Japan. The other school insists the "Kyushu Yamatai-koku" did not move, and was conquered by the forced of the Yamato (based in Kinai).

proposed the which states that of is different from the of ( and and the "Queen's country" in Tsukushi moved to Kinai after the "". It is assumed that the new royal capital, which was the capital of Japan, is Yamatai.(Masao Kume, "New Yamataikoku Theory: The Queen's Onimichi and the War of Conquest," Rekishi ni okeru Seiji to Minzoku (Politics and the People in History), 1986; "The Seal of the Emperor of Japan Wei and Its Historical Background," Studies in the History of Japanese Seals, Yusankaku, 2004).

Evidence for the Honshu Theory In the 1960s, it was thought that artifacts from the period of the Yamataikoku were abundant in Kyushu while those from the Kinai region were scarce in the Kinai region. The National Institute for Radiocarbon Dating and Dendrochronology has presented a chronology based on radiocarbon dating and dendrochronology that compares the tombs of Himiko and the Yamato imperial court to those of Yamatai and Himiko, and that the establishment of the Yamato Imperial Court dates back to that time. Some have suggested that radiocarbon dating of pottery from the Kinai region by the National Institute of Japanese Archaeology and Dating suggests that the establishment of the early state in the Yamato region of the Kinai region dates back to the same period as the Yamataikoku.。. According to this Kinai theory, there was at least one power in 3rd century Japan that was able to secure transportation routes from Yamato to the continent, and it can be said that a power with great influence over the entire of western Japan centering on Yamato, namely the "Yamato Kingdom," was already established at this time.The Makimuku ruins site is considered by some researchers to be the best candidate for the center of the Yamatai, and may be the site that proves the . In 2011, a part of another large building was found about 5 meters to the east of the large building ruins, and the building ruins may have been built in the late 3rd century or later.2011年4月28日産経新聞関西「大和政権の重要施設か、纒向遺跡で新たな大型建物跡」 2019年8月14日archive差し替え・閲覧

The is a megalithic tomb (kofun) located in Sakurai City, Nara Prefecture, Japan. The Hashihaka kofun is considered to be the first large keyhole-shaped kofun constructed in Japan and is associated with the emergence of the Yamato Kingship. It is sometimes considered the birthplace of the Kofun system of tombs which is highly linked to the emergence of a state level society.都出比呂志 (1991). "日本古代国家形成論序説-前方後円墳体制論の提唱-". 日本史研究. Vol. 343.

Basic rationale for the Kyushu Theory The basic arguments for the Kyushu theory of the Yamatai Kingdom include the following.

The Wajinden in the Book of Wei describes the route and distance from the Wei to Yamatai-koku. The route started from Daifang commandery. It went along the Southern coast of the Korean peninsula, through the Kan-koku (Mohan), then reached to the Kuya-kan-koku (Kuya-han). The route crossed the sea, and reached to the land of Kyushu (Wa), where there were 30 countries and the "Queen's country" (Yamataikoku). Considering the 12,000 li distance from Daifang commandery to the "Queen's country" (Yamatai-koku), taken as a travelling distance rather than a straight line, it would take 10,500 li to get to Ito-koku, which is located in Fukuoka Prefecture. The remaining 1,500 li (three times the distance of 500 li from Ito-koku to Matsuro-koku, which is located in Karatsu City, Saga Prefecture), is not enough to locate the Yamatai Kingdom beyond Kyushu. The state of Kuna-koku (Kununokuni), which was recorded as being in conflict with the Yamatai-koku, could be identified with the polity of Kumaso, and mentions of an official of Kuna-koku named "Kukochi-hiko" could be identified as another transliteration of "Kikuchi-hiko", a reference to Kyushu's Kikuchi River.

There is a theory that the Hashihaka grave mound, which is said to be the oldest keyhole-shaped mound in Nara Prefecture Sakurai City, was built in the latter half of the 3rd century and is considered to be Himiko's burial mound. However, after the death of Himiko, a male king ascended to the throne, and it is recorded that the country was in turmoil again. It is unlikely for the polity to build a burial mound with the largest mound at that time when the country was in turmoil. In addition, there are no traces of large-scale violence in the area surrounding the tomb. Also, the tombs of neighboring places such as the Korean Peninsula at that time were all around 30 meters on each side, and it is unreasonable to assume that Japan was the only country to build such a huge tomb (i.e. the Hashihaka Tomb). In addition, the Museum, Archaeological Institute of Kashihara, Nara Prefecture, which in 2008 conducted the Archaeological excavation of the Hokenoyama burial mound, which is said to predate the Hashihaka Tomb in terms of age, concluded that the burial mound was built in the middle of the 3rd century based on the excavated artifacts. However, because the range of Radiocarbon dating results of burial chamber wood is reported to include the first half of the 4th century, some have questioned the dating of the middle of the 3rd century. Advocates of the Kyushu theory of the Yamataikoku include Arai Hakuseki, Shiratori Kurakichi, Dairoku Harada, Taku Tanaka, Takehiko Furuta, Kenzaburo Torigoe,"Great Yamatai Country" and others Toshiaki Wakai, Biten Yasumoto, Toshio Hoga and others. In addition, it is said that research based on domestic materials such as "Kiki" tends not to be taken into consideration, despite the indications of Taro Sakamoto's "The Birth of the Nation" and Hidesaburo Hara, and Toshiaki Wakai said about this tendency before the war. He criticizes the repressed theory of Sokichi Tsuda as being caused by being touted even after the war.

See also Wajinden

Notes

References