Daniel Shabetai Milo (; born 21 August 1953 as Daniel Milwitzky) is an Israeli-French philosopher and writer. Milo is a professor of natural philosophy at the École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (EHESS), Paris. He is the author of nine books, eight published by Les Belles Lettres in Paris and one at Harvard University Press, and has written thirty-five articles and book chapters; his work was translated into nine languages.For a full list, see DanielMilo.com, under "Biography and Publications." He directed three short films"Between Sofa and Ceiling" (2000), "Grandpa, What Have You Done in Summer 2002?" (2002), and "Hunger as Art" (2005). See External links, YouTube Personal Channel and several theatrical productions. The leitmotiv of his scientific and artistic work is excess. His ambition is to revive natural philosophy, the precursor of modern science during the centuries between Aristotle and Darwin.
Biography Daniel S. Milo was born in Tel Aviv, Israel in 1953. His father, Yossef Milo (Milwitsky), was born in Berlin and his mother, Bruria Milo (née Weitzen), was from Poland. He obtained B.A. and M.A. degrees in philosophy, comparative literature, and film studies at the University of Tel Aviv, completing his master's thesis in 1980."The Culinary Character of Cinamatic Language", Semiotica, N° 58, 1/2 (1986), pp. 83-99. After moving to Paris in 1982, Milo wrote a Ph.D. dissertation in cultural studies at the École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (EHESS) and was subsequently elected professor at the same institution.
Work Cultural Studies and the Quantitative Method Milo's Ph.D. dissertation, "Survival in Culture," was his research into excess and his first encounter with Darwinism. There are too candidates to the cultural pantheon. The struggle for life in collective memory is Malthusian. He treated posterity as the cultural equivalent of natural selection. Milo was a pioneer in applying quantitative tools to the cultural canon. He assessed the posthumous life of an artist or a work by counting its presence in textbooks,"Les classiques scolaires", in Les Lieux de Mémoire, (Ed. Pierre Nora), II, 3, pp.517-562. translations, museums, encyclopedias,"Le Phœnix culturel: De la résurrection en histoire de l'art; L'exemple des peintres français, 165O-175O", Revue française de Sociologie, XXVI-3 (Juillet-Septembre 1986), pp. 481-5O3. theatrical repertoires, etc. He was the first to study translationsJean Deslisle, "Dimensions culturelles de certaines fonction de la traduction," Atelier de traduction (Roumanie), no 21, 2014, p. 37-60. and street names"The history of street names has become fashionable in Italy in recent years. When Daniel Milo’s work on 'Nom des rues' appeared in 1986 in the Lieux de mémoire edited by Pierre Nora, Italian historiography had yet to produce anything significant on the subject. Almost twenty years later, as a result of an enlargement of the traditional sources of political and diplomatic history, the scenario is enhanced by different, interesting contributions, especially at a local level." Roberto Balzani, "Urban Toponomy, Cultural memory and the World Wars", in Elena Lamberti and Vita Fortunati, Eds., Memories and Representations of War The Case of World War I and World War II. as historical and cultural markers.“Street Names,” in Realms of Memory: The Construction of the French Past, vol. 2, ed. Pierre Nora and Lawrence D. Kritzman (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), 363–389 ("Le nom des rues", in Les Lieux de Mémoire, Tome II, La Nation, Volume 3, (Ed. Pierre Nora), Paris, Gallimard, 1986, pp. 283-315.) "Le musical et le social: Variations sur quatre textes de William Weber", Annales E.S.C., 42e Année, N° 1 (janvier-février 1987), pp. 27-40. Two of the chapters of the dissertation were published in the Lieux de mémoire (Sites of Memory) and one in the Annales HSS.
Historiography: The Question of Periodization The next phase in Milo's research was questioning periodization, the division of the past into distinct parts, in Trahir le temps (histoire) [Betraying Time (History)].Trahir le temps (histoire), 1991, Paris, Les Bettres This project began with a thought experiment: What if we began to reckon time, not from the crucifixion of Christ (1 AD) but from his Passion (33 AD)?"Une histoire-fiction: l'ère de la passion," in Trahir le temps, 17-28. All dates would then be thrown off by 33 years, the first third of each century thus going to the century before. This game of historical fiction allows us to problematize the arbitrary notion of "century." Milo then questioned other divisions of the past, with recurrent emphasis on their artificiality; hence, the metaphor of "gerrymandering time." The title of the book plays on the two meanings of the French verb "trahir," to betray and to reveal. In order to study the past one needs to betray it, and the most traitorous tool is periodization because arbitrary periods suggest the existence of realities that do not truly exist. Among these divisions, he studied the notion of generationNeutraliser la chronologie: Génération comme paradigme scientifique," Trahir le temps, 179-192. and the invention of the split BC (before Christ)/AD (Anno Domini), which is a division that is totally irrelevant to practically all historical phenomena."Esquisse d'une histoire de l'ère chrétienne," Trahir le temps, 101-128. In a study on the so-called terrors of the Year 1000"L'An Mil: Un problème d'historiographie moderne", History and Theory, Vol XXVII, N° 3 (1988), pp.261-281. "L'An Mil n'a pas eu lieu", in L'Esprit de l'Europe. I. Dates et Lieux (Eds A. Compagnon & J. Seebacher), Paris, Flammarion, 1993, pp. 64-72. he showed that this collective psychosis could not have existed because 99% of the medieval population ignored the date of the year in which they lived. He then showed that the birth of the myth was coupled with the invention of the division of time into periods of 100 years; the century was invented around 1600 and became standard around 1800."Et la Révolution créa le siècle," Trahir le temps, 29-62. "Milo won acclaim by his intriguing study Trahir le temps in which he deconstructed our periodization of history time by means of experimental models."Tomasz Wiślicz, "The Annals School and the Challenge of the Late 20th Century. Criticisms and Tentative," Acta Poloniae Historica, 92. 2005. "A book in epistemology, funny and subversive, on cutting time," Christian Delacampagne, "Erreurs de calendrier," Le Monde, March 21, 1991. See also Pierre Chaunu, "Les futurs antérieurs," Le Figaro, February 24, 1991.
Experimental History Betraying reality in order to reveal it is at the basis of the experimental method. Milo wrote a manifesto, "Pour une histoire expérimentale ou La gaie science" (Toward an Experimental History or The Gay Science)"Pour une histoire expérimentale ou La gaie science," in Daniel S. Milo & Alain Boureau (Eds.), Alter Histoire. Essais d’histoire expérimentale, Paris, Les Belles lettres, 1991. "Pour une histoire expérimentale, ou la gaie histoire," Annales E.S.C. (1990), 717-734. that was translated into German (twice),"Für eine experimentelle Geschichte oder Die freuliche Geschichte", kultuRRevolution, N° 24 (Januar 1991), pp.31-37; "Für eine experimentelle Geschichte. Ein Manifest", in Zeit des Eriegnisses - Ende der Geschichte? (Eds F. Balke, E. Méchoulan, B. Wagner), Munich, Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1992, pp.293-322 English,"Toward an Experimental History", Strategies, N° 4-5 (1991), pp. 87-126 and Russian."За экспериментальную, или веселую, историю" THESIS, 1994, вып. 5, 185-2005 Following Claude Bernard's Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine (1865), Milo enumerated several archetypal experimental methods: graft, ablation, injection, transfer, change of scale, and collage. He gathered a group of historians willing to play with the past. The results were published in Alter histoire: Essais d'histoire expérimentale (Alter History: Essays in Experimental History, 1991).Alter Histoire. Essais d'histoire expérimentale (with Alain Boureau et al.,), 1991, Paris, Les Belles Lettres Alter Histoire provoked bitter controversy but ended reaching the status of a classic: "this was the most radical and also the most interesting plan for renovating history in France in the 1990s. What is more, the plan was carried out."Tomasz Wiślicz, "The Annals School and the Challenge of the Late 20th Century. Criticisms and Tentative," Acta Poloniae Historica, 92. 2005
Experimental Philosophy Most questions about human affairs are not testable because of the constraints on human subject research. So Milo sought willing subjects in literature. In the 1990s, he studied in Héros & Cobayes (Heroes & Guinea Pigs, 1997),Héros & Cobayes, 1997, Les belles Lettres, Paris. "Heroes as Guinea Pigs", Common Knowledge, V. 5, N° 1 (Spring 1996), pp. 33-58 fictional situations as laboratories and fictional personae as guinea pigs. Milo read the story of the Garden of Eden as a laboratory in cognitive science. God puts Adam in front of two trees: the tree of life and the tree of knowledge. Strangely, He forbids Adam from eating from the latter but says nothing about the former. As a result, the guinea pig is obsessed by the prohibited fruit and is indifferent to that which was permitted.
Philosophy: Objectivity and Narcissus Milo deals with the subject of philosophical relativism in Pour Narcisse: Essai de l'amour impartial (For Narcissus: Essay in Impartial Love, 1995);Pour Narcisse: Essai de l'amour impartial, 1995, Paris, Les Belles Lettres. the book was translated into Polish.Pochwała Narcyza. O miłości bezstronnej, 2006, by Agata Gołębiewska, Jaworski, Warsaw. A literal reading of the story of Narcissus by Milo reveals, first, that Narcissus doesn't fall in love with himself but with a reflection on the water that he does not recognize as his own. Second, his love is far from being subjective. Narcissus is perfection incarnate; that's why all the characters in the story, humans and nymphs, fall in love with him. Most philosophers and scientists would agree the morality of the fable: objectivity is rare; it is dangerous; but it exists.
Ethics: Clefs (Keys) In Clefs (1993),Clefs, 1995, Paris, Les Belles Lettres. also published into Spanish,Llaves, Translated by Rolando Pratz-Paez, Miami, 2005, Ediciones Catalejo Milo reads verbal noises: stereotypes, platitudes, clichés, tropisms, truisms—as philosophical theses. The first section, "Phrases", is made of 222 sentences such as "Even a Kafka was Kafka only two hours per day" and "Underwater, all icebergs are wet." The second section, "Standards," offers a series of jam sessions on commonplaces and maxims such as "Don't talk about rope in a hanged man's house,” and "It's not so simple." In the third section, "Locks," Milo suggests that the three metaphors we live by are Épicerie (grocer's shop), Paranoia, and Iceberg (EPI). In the grocer's shop there is no such thing as a free lunch. For the paranoiac everything has meaning. In the iceberg the meaning is between the lines. The grocer cannot admit unilateral actions. For the paranoiac nothing is neutral. And the enemy of the interpreter is literality. Simplicity is the unthinkable of the three.
Natural Philosophy: Future and Excess