Thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) is a process through which surrounding thermal energy changes population of excited states of molecular compounds and thus, alters light emission. The TADF process usually involves an excited molecular species in a triplet state, which commonly has a forbidden transition to the singlet ground state, termed phosphorescence. By absorbing nearby thermal energy, the triplet state can undergo reverse intersystem crossing (RISC) converting the triplet state population to an excited singlet state, which then emits light to the singlet ground state in a delayed process termed delayed fluorescence. Accordingly, in many cases, the TADF molecules show two types of emission, a delayed fluorescence and a prompt fluorescence. This is found for specific organic molecules, but also for selected organo-transition metal compounds, such as Cu(I) complexes. Along with traditional organic fluorescent molecules and phosphorescent organo-transition metal complexes, TADF compounds belong to the three main light-emitting material groups used in organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs).
History The first evidence of thermally activated delayed fluorescence in an organic molecule was discovered in 1961 investigating the compound eosin. The emission detected was termed "E-type" delayed fluorescence, but the mechanism was not completely understood. In 1986, this mechanism was further investigated and described in detail using aromatic thiones, but a practical use was only identified much later.
Application of the TADF mechanism for efficient light generation in OLEDs was proposed in 2008 by Yersin and coworkers and subsequently intensively studied. Originally the corresponding mechanism was designated as "singlet harvesting mechanism". Since 2009, the mechanism was extensively investigated by Chihaya Adachi and coworkers as well as by other research groups. A series of papers were published, reporting effective TADF molecular design strategies focusing on different TADF compounds. Extensive studies of green, orange, and blue emitting OLEDs based on organic TADF materials spiked interest in the TADF field. This mechanism was soon considered as possible high efficiency alternative to traditional fluorescent and also phosphorescent compounds used in lighting displays so far. TADF materials are being considered the third generation of OLEDs following fluorescent and phosphorescent based devices.
Mechanism The steps of the TADF mechanism are displayed in the figure at right (where it is assumed that the ground state is a singlet state, which is usually but not always the case). In the electroluminescent process, which is observed in OLEDs, an electrical excitation leads to population of singlet and triplet states of the TADF molecules. From the singlet state an allowed transition can occur to the electronic singlet ground state on a time scale of 10 to 100 nanoseconds for organic TADF molecules. This emission represents the prompt fluorescence. Principally, the electron can undergo a forbidden de-excitation to the ground state as a radiative transition, called phosphorescence, or as a non-radiative process. However, this occurs on a much slower time scale, being on the order of microseconds to seconds. However, in suitable cases, thermal activation from the triplet to the excited singlet state, the reverse intersystem crossing, can populate the singlet state in a fast process by quenching the triplet state population. As a consequence, delayed fluorescence is observed. Accordingly, when a TADF material becomes electronically excited, it exhibits prompt fluorescence and delayed fluorescence, usually occurring at (almost) the same wavelength. Selected organo-transition metal compounds can show both TADF and relatively fast phosphorescence.
In an OLED based on traditional fluorescent materials only harvesting of the singlet state population is possible. Thus, due to spin statistics only 25% of the excitation can be exploited. On the other hand, both specific phosphorescent and TADF materials have the ability to harvest the excitation from both singlet and triplet states, theoretically allowing these materials to convert close to 100% of the electrically generated excitons, giving them a large advantage over traditional fluorescent-based materials. However, due to light out-coupling losses in OLED devices, the external quantum efficiency (EQE) is, without employing specific out-coupling enhancement strategies, substantially lower, lying slightly above 5% and 20%, respectively.
OLEDs, excitons, spin statistics, and electroluminescence An OLED device consists of a cathode and an anode and in between a number of layers that guarantee optimized electron transport (from the cathode) and hole transport (from the anode) toward the emission layer, where the emitter molecules are doped in a host matrix. The figure shown displays schematically a simplified OLED device structure. Usually, other layers are applied, such as electron and hole injection layers as well as electron and hole blocking layers, respectively, to confine both electrons and holes to the emission layer (EML). For high-performance OLEDs, an optimized charge carrier balance should be achieved. The thickness of the different layers adds up to only several hundred nanometers.
Both electron and hole attract each other by long-range Coulomb forces even up to a separation of around 15 nm. The bound electron-hole pairs represent the excitons. Very frequently, one of the charge carriers, hole or electron, is trapped at the emitter molecule, while attracting the opposite charge. In this situation, the exciton represents a charge transfer (CT) exciton. Each charge carrier carries a spin and both spins couple via their magnetic moments. Due to quantum mechanical rules, the spins can combine in four different ways: in an antiparallel orientation, giving a singlet S with a multiplicity of 1, and three different parallel orientations, giving a triplet T with multiplicity of 3 (see the figure). For an ensemble of charge carriers, electrons (e) and holes (h) couple according to the following rule:
4(e + h) = 1 S + 3 T
Thus, spin-statistics results in 25% singlet excitons and 75% triplet excitons. In other words, the corresponding exciton states, 1CT(exciton) and 3CT(exciton), are populated accordingly. Subsequently, fast spin-allowed radiationless relaxation, occurring within the respective singlet and triplet manifold of states, leads to population of the energetically lowest excited singlet and triplet states of the emitter molecule. As a consequence, regarding an ensemble of doped emitter molecules electrical excitation results in 25% excited singlet states and in 75% triplet states. Finally, properties of these emitter molecules do not only determine emission color, luminescence quantum yield, emission decay time, etc., but they are crucially responsible for harvesting the singlet as well as the triplet excitons. In other words, the population of the different exciton spin states should relax to the lowest excited states of the doped molecules and then be transferred into light, representing the electroluminescence. However, this does not occur for all luminescent molecules, even if they show almost 100% photoluminescence quantum yield, because, for example, exciton harvesting is incomplete. Thus, only specific molecules can guarantee maximum exploitation of all singlet and triplet excitations. This can be realized with phosphorescent metal complexes or TADF molecules.
Factors affecting TADF Several key kinetic properties of TADF materials determine their ability to efficiently generate light through delayed fluorescence, while minimizing thermal loss pathways. The rates of intersystem crossing (ISC), referred to as kISC, and of reverse intersystem crossing (RISC), given by kRISC, both determined by spin-orbit coupling, should be as fast as possible. In particular, kRISC should be faster than the rates of non-radiative triplet relaxation pathways. Most non-radiative triplet pathways like triplet-triplet annihilation, triplet quenching, or thermal decay occur on the order of microseconds or longer, which usually is long compared to the RISC time. Thus, under suitable conditions, singlet state population is faster.
Another key property is the energy difference between the singlet and triplet states ΔEST. In particular, as kRISC depends exponentially on this energy gap, it should be small, that is smaller than a few times the thermal energy available at ambient temperature (≈25.6 meV) to effectively allow for fast reverse intersystem crossing. Minimization of this energy gap is thus, considered to be one of the most important strategies in synthesizing potential TADF materials. The most effective strategies employed so far to synthesize TADF molecules are based on donor and acceptor moieties spaced apart or twisted with respect to each other. This effectively reduces the energy gap ΔEST.
Moreover, the TADF decay time, representing another key parameter, should be as short as possible in order to reduce unwanted chemical reactions during excited state population. This represents a further challenge and requires specific molecular design strategies.
Chemical structures
The chemical structures of many commonly used TADF materials reflect the requirement to minimize the ΔEST by displaying a twisted structure. One of the most commonly used and successful TADF materials, 2,4,5,6-tetra(9H-carbazol-9-yl)isophthalonitrile (4CzIPN), contains this type of structure as the bottom and top carbazole groups can be viewed as flat and coplanar while the bottom left and bottom right carbazole groups can be thought of as coming into and out of the page. This type of molecule contains electron donating and electron accepting moieties showing small orbital overlap between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO). As a consequence, small singlet-triplet splitting, small ΔEST, is resulting.
Many highly efficient TADF materials contain multiple carbazole groups as electron donors and, for example, incorporate electron acceptors, like triazines, sulfoxides, benzophenones, and spiro-based groups. The table below shows several examples of these compounds that have been reported to yield high efficiencies and relatively small ΔEST.
+High Efficiency TADF Compounds Chemical Name Photoluminescence wavelength (nm)Electroluminescence wavelength (nm) ΔEST (eV)Device Efficiency, EQE (%)34TCzPN4484750.1621.8DMAC-TRZ4954950.04626.5Ac-MPM4894890.1924.5DMAC-DPS4654760.0819.5DTCBPy5185140.0427.2ACRSA4854900.0416.5POB-PZX4825030.02822.1PXZ-Mes3B5075020.07122.8
In a recent design strategy, electron donating and accepting moieties are separated by two bridges, leading to the DSH molecule. For this molecule, extremely small orbital overlap between HOMO and LUMO is resulting. Thus, ultra-small energy gap ΔEST between the lowest excited singlet and triplet states of only about 1 meV is obtained. For this specific molecule, an ultra-short emission decay time, lying in the sub-microsecond time range, is attained. An OLED device fabricated, shows EQE of ≈ 19%.
A number of organo-transition metal complexes, for example, based on Cu(I), Ag(I), Au(I), Au(III) metal centers, exhibit also distinct TADF behavior. In particular, Cu(I) compounds synthesized with different ligands display a wide range of ΔEST values, extending from around 33 to 160 meV. The depicted Cu(I) compound shows an example.