The Indigo Era (or Indigo economies) is a concept publicized by businessman Mikhail Fridman, describing what he views as an emerging new era of economies and economics based on ideas, innovation, and creativity, replacing those based on the possession of natural resources. Fridman is the co-founder of LetterOne, an international investment business,"Mikhail Fridman". Global Perspectives. Retrieved 13 October 2017. and first publicized the idea in early 2016. The word "indigo" was initially chosen based on the term indigo children, which has been used to describe people with unusual and innovative abilities.
Fridman describes the Indigo Era as a disruptive era driven by extraordinary levels of human creativity, where abnormally talented individuals and entities are able to realize new levels of human potential and economic achievement. It is "a new economic era where the main source of national wealth is no longer resource rent but the socio-economic infrastructure that allows every person to realise his or her intellectual or creative potential." But, according to Fridman – based on his observations of recent economic indicators, political and market volatility, and historical patterns – it is also an era that will generate winners and losers as lagging countries and groups fail to adapt quickly enough.
In late 2016 LetterOne's Global Perspectives journal published an Indigo Index, ranking 152 countries on their ability to compete and grow as economies move away from being powered by natural resources to being powered by ideas, creativity, and digital skills. In 2017 it launched the Indigo Prize, to award new concepts of economic measurement beyond mere GDP as countries in the 21st century transition into economies where innovation, creativity, and digital skills are economic drivers. The competition is intended to "stimulate debate about factors currently measured, given evolving economies, technology and skill bases, and what should now be taken into consideration in official economic statistics that measure the health, size and growth of a modern economy."
Origin
In an April 2016 article in RealClearPolitics and reprinted in the Jerusalem Post, Fridman wrote:
LetterOne's Global Perspectives website adds that the indigo symbolism "embodies a breaking of the norm, something that is highly reflective of the new era that we are entering into, one that lacks convention and is driven by innovation."
Analysis In a series of articles published in 2016, Fridman cites the recent extreme volatility in markets, and worldwide political change and instability, as signs of an emerging global shift.Fridman, Mikhail. "Поколение индиго. Вход свободный" (in Russian). Forbes. 5 May 2016.Fridman, Mikhail. "The Indigo Generation. Admission Free". ABH Holdings. 5 May 2016."Searching for Growth in an Unstable Global Economy: A conversation with Mikhail Fridman and Anatole Kaletsky" . Milken Institute Review. 3rd Quarter 2016: 7 July 2016. pp. 68–76. (Reprinted: ) He notes two frequently cited prominent indicators of an economic shift: the sharp decline in prices of natural resources including oil, and the slowing of China's economic growth despite this decline in the cost of natural resources.Fridman, Mikhail. "Fundamentals of a strong economy" . ABH Holdings. 30 September 2016.
He and other commentators also note the rise of populism and populist leaders and candidates, both right-wing and left-wing, as these changes occur.Greenberg, Stanley. "We Need a New Progressive Era of Renewal". Global Perspectives. Volume 1. November 2016. Meanwhile, companies like Apple and Google – digital and technological companies he calls "Indigo companies" – have replaced longterm traditional natural-resource or manufacturing companies such as Exxon as the world's largest companies.
Fridman observes that throughout history innovations, alternatives, and technologies have always overcome any perceived shortages of any natural resource. He therefore posits that the new "Indigo era", fueled by digital and technological resources, will be marked by a shift away from the struggle for natural resources and their perceived scarcity, to a reliance on ideas, innovation, and creativity and on supporting the intellectual and creative potential of each human being: "The world has entered a new era where the source of a nation's wealth is no longer natural resources. Intellectual capacity has now replaced land, raw materials and trade routes as the biggest source of wealth."
According to Fridman, three interconnected factors are needed for successful Indigo companies and an Indigo economy:文丨陳召強. "讓我們在灰霾中瞭望靛藍指數，這次比的不是天空" (in Chinese). KK News. 19 December 2016. intuitive individual talent and a high level of education, plus the ability to form a team of equally educated and gifted people a sophisticated and complex ecosystem, which includes not only legal systems that protect physical and intellectual property rights and protection from takeover by larger companies, but also thousands of suppliers and subcontractors to supply high-quality services which range from venture capital to marketing to web design and other technologies and services a global digital infrastructure to distribute new products and accumulate customer data and customer-behavior insight
He notes that most emerging economies have focused on building physical structures (roads, buildings, cities, physical infrastructure) rather than the complex legal, political, and social systems, institutions, and changes that will support an effective free and innovative intellectual-resource economy. The freedoms, protections, and political and legal frameworks of developed Western countries rest on centuries-long histories, socio-political traditions, and mindsets, and therefore will be difficult to replicate quickly in emerging economies. Fridman singles out India as an emerging country that has adequate legal infrastructure and freedom to probably survive the Indigo shift.
Fridman considers the growth of Indigo economies to be a paradigm shift; he states that the pace at which technology is developing is creating worldwide tectonic shifts, and predicts huge global change over the next five to ten years. He and other analysts predict that the growing economic gap between free, creative economies and groups in contrast to repressive, authoritarian, totalitarian, or tradition-bound economies or groups will widen and create resentment and hostilities – whether this is between nations or within nations."Editorial". Global Perspectives. Volume 1. November 2016. Those left behind may be either emerging countries, or the average person – as opposed to the intellectual elites – within developed Western countries.
Authoritarian leaders and authoritarianism often rise during periods of uncertainty and insecurity and economic deprivation. Fridman maintains however that in this ever-changing new economic era, the main source of wealth in a country or region will no longer be a natural resource, but a social infrastructure that will allow everyone to realise their intellectual and creative potential. Therefore, he asserts that "The future Indigo economy is an economy of free people. And this means that the world will become more and more free."
In November 2016 LetterOne launched a journal, Global Perspectives, as a platform to explore "the new emerging economic era, the Indigo era, from different perspectives, including education, religion, politics, economics, history and business" and to examine "global issues through the eyes of leading commentators and business people around the world"."The Global Perspectives Journal examines global issues through the eyes of leading commentators and business people around the world" . LetterOne. Retrieved 14 October 2017. The inaugural issue contained articles by Fridman, Dominic Barton, Michael Bloomberg, Stan Greenberg, Carl Bildt, Vince Cable, Ken Robinson, Brent Hoberman, Alex Klein, Deirdre McCloskey, Yuri Milner, Nick D'Aloisio, Lynda Gratton, Parag Khanna, Ian Goldin, George Freeman, Ian Bremmer, and others."Articles". Global Perspectives. Volume 1. November 2016."Contributors". Global Perspectives. Volume 1. November 2016.
Indigo Index and Indigo Score The November 2016 inaugural issue of Global Perspectives also published an Indigo Index,"Indigo Score". Global Perspectives. Volume 1. November 2016."Global Perspectives publishes the Indigo Score". European Commission. 1 November 2016. which rated 152 countries based on five key metrics for doing business as economies move away from being powered by natural resources to being powered by creativity and digital skills.Solomon, Shoshanna. "Israel ranks only 36th out of 152 nations in new innovation index". Times of Israel. 7 December 2016. The five metrics are: creativity and innovation, economic diversity, digital economy, freedom, and stability and legal frameworks,Washtell, Francesca. "These are the countries that will thrive in the post-Trump, post-Brexit era according to the new Indigo Index". City A.M. 6 December 2016."Denmark ranks fourth of 152 countries in new innovation index". Copenhagen Capacity. 13 December 2016. which were scored based on over 30 measures from published data sources such as the World Bank, UNESCO, the CIRI Human Rights Data Project, the Center for International Development at Harvard University, and the Global Education Monitoring Report.Elliott, Larry. "UK's digital strength could mean bright economic future – study". The Guardian. 7 December 2016.A.D. "Te państwa mają największe szanse na dynamiczny rozwój. Wielka Brytania w czołówce" (in Polish). Forsal. 9 December 2017. The index sought to measure a country's entrepreneurial ecosystem, and therefore its potential to adapt and develop.Scott, Patrick. "UK among top five countries best equipped for the post-Brexit era, new study shows". The Telegraph. 7 December 2016."Nordics among best countries in new innovation index". Scandinavian-Polish Chamber of Commerce. 14 December 2016.
Each country was given a combined overall Indigo Score, with 200 being the highest possible score."Country Rankings". Global Perspectives. Volume 1. November 2016.Zhao, Ziye. "World Indigo Index Ranking" . Chartist.co. 22 December 2016. The 10 top-ranked countries were Sweden, Switzerland, Finland, Denmark, the UK, the Netherlands, Norway, Germany, Ireland, and Japan."New Innovation Index" . Knowledge Library. KnowledgeBusiness.com. 22 December 2016.Stokel-Walker, Chris. "How to Be Optimistic About a Post-Brexit Britain". Bloomberg News. 5 December 2016. The United States was 18th overall.
The report also included three key findings: Creativity and innovation was the biggest overall driver of high scores; this accentuated the importance of fostering entrepreneurialism and lifelong learning and of investing heavily in people. Nordic countries scored particularly high on the Indigo Index, with three Nordic countries in the top four and four Nordic countries in the top ten; this was attributed to their high rankings both in creativity and innovation and in freedom. And the lowest-scoring countries were beset with social and political problems, such as war, political turmoil, and corruption."Indigo Score Ranking". Global Perspectives. Volume 1. November 2016.
Indigo Prize