The welfare of farmed insects concerns treatment of insects raised for animal feed, as food or pet food, and other purposes such as honey and silk, for use in generating recombinant proteins, or for biological control applications.
Debate over insects' capacity for welfare
Scientists remain uncertain about the existence and degree of pain in invertebrates, including insects. However, a recent review of the neurobiological and behavioral evidence consistent with the hypothesis of pain found strong evidence consistent with precautionary treatment in at least two orders of insects at the adult life stage (Blattodea and Diptera), ultimately considering evidence from over 350 studies. This may explain why 67% of surveyed animal behavior researchers ascribed emotions (of which pain is one), to some, most, nearly all or all insects and why 82% of surveyed entomologists stated they cared about insect welfare due to the intrinsic value of the animal. Both the 2012 Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness, and the 2024 New York Declaration on Animal Consciousness, suggest that there is a realistic possibility of insect consciousness; the New York Declaration signed by many animal ethicists, welfare scientists, neuroscientists, entomologists, and consciousness researchers.
As a result of the growing evidence base supporting the plausibility of insect pain and sentience, insect welfare is being increasingly discussed in all settings where insects are used and managed, including laboratory settings. Vincent Wigglesworth suggested a precautionary approach of anaesthetizing insects during potentially painful procedures. John Cooper has written about techniques for "Anesthesia, analgesia, and euthanasia of invertebrates" including insects. Neil A. C. Bennie and colleagues proposed a method for chemical euthanasia of insects and other terrestrial arthropods. As of 2024, the Insect Welfare Research Society guidelines for protecting and promoting insect welfare in research recommend chemical agents, rapid freezing, immersion in alcohol following anesthesia, or crushing/grinding as methods that may humanely euthanize insects. Insect welfare is currently not regulated in research settings, resulting in the frequent reporting of some low-welfare practices such as vivisection (live dissection of an animal without anesthetics) in the discipline. Recent research suggests that the Canadian public believes insect welfare in research should be regulated to 2/3rds the level of oversight given to vertebrates.
Some authors, including animal ethicists and academics that research insect farming, have begun extending discussions of insect welfare beyond the laboratory to the domain of raising insects for food, feed, or pet food. The Dutch Animal Act, which went into effect on 1 January 2013, created a regulatory framework for farm-animal welfare based on the Five Freedoms, and the law specifically lists a number of insect species as "production animals" whose wellbeing needs to be respected. Dutch politician Marianne Thieme asked a series of questions suggesting concern that insect farming would multiply the number of animals farmed and killed for human consumption. Robert Nathan Allen of the pro-entomophagy organization Little Herds feels that the welfare of insects is important, though he believes well managed farms can maintain high standards of care. Some entomophagy suppliers highlight the importance of humane insect treatment, though the industry recognizes that evidence on which practices actually result in humane treatment is currently lacking. For instance, World Ento uses the name "Good Karma Killing" to describe its process of freezing insects into a stasis state, but this method is not expected to produce a humane death according to the American Veterinary and Medical Association. A 2013 FAO report on "Edible insects" includes a section encouraging high standards of welfare in entomophagy operations, despite uncertainty about whether insects can suffer.
Others feel that considering the wellbeing of farmed insects is going too far. Rhys Southan suggests that even most vegans do not care a lot about insects, but that "Insects are to animal rights what Larry Flynt is to the First Amendment—you have to uphold their rights even if you don't want to, or the whole thing falls apart." He goes on to propose satirical slogans that insect-rights activists might use against entomophagy. However, data on public perceptions suggests that many members of the mainstream American public care about insect welfare in farming, particularly younger consumers, as do traditional animal welfare NGOs in Europe. Accordingly, animal welfare scientists have suggested that insect farmers may care about insect welfare for social and economical reasons, such as consumer confidence in the industry's adherence to high ethical standards for animal rearing, maintaining their social license to operate, and brand differentiation opportunities that increase industry maturation. Some recent anecdotes suggest there is growing public interest in insect welfare, at least in research: public outcry over lethal wasp scientific surveys in the UK resulted in a BBC podcast episode about lethal sampling with entomologist Adam Hart and a publication about invertebrate research ethics.
Welfare considerations during farmed insect rearing
As with other livestock animals, a variety of welfare concerns can manifest during the rearing and slaughter of insects. The 5 Domains framework can be used to broadly categorize these areas of possible concern into four functional domains (nutrition, environment, behavior, and physical health) which then influence the mental domain of the animal's welfare state. As the insect industry is very new, and there are few animal welfare scientists dedicated to studying its livestock, there is little guidance or infrastructure dedicated to improving farmed insect welfare. Further, just as with farmed vertebrates, species-specific guidance is needed to maintain high welfare for each species of insects that is farmed. Recently, several comprehensive and open access review papers have been published that cover the likely welfare concerns for black soldier flies (Hermetia illucens), yellow mealworms (Tenebrio molitor), and three species of farmed crickets (Acheta domesticus, Gryllus bimaculatus, Gryllodes sigillatus), as well as some work on the housefly (Musca domestica).
The major, currently known areas of welfare concern during rearing are organized below by functional domain and largely focus on the most farmed insects: black soldier flies, yellow mealworms, and farmed crickets.
Nutrition Appropriate nutrition may not always be provided to farmed insects. For instance, adult black soldier flies are generally not fed during rearing due to a common misconception that they cannot eat (which is true for some insects, such as adult silkworm moths). In reality, adult black soldier flies have functional mouthparts and a functional digestive system, can break down both carbohydrates and proteins, will gravitate towards and consume food when provided, have food preferences, and have a prolonged lifespan when fed.
Insects may be fasted prior to slaughter (with unknown welfare impacts); this is generally to improve taste/quality of the resulting product or to reduce the likelihood of microbial contamination of the product due to the feed. More evidence is needed to know if fasting periods are necessary for product safety, as some research suggests they may not reduce microbial loads.
Farmed insects may be provided with homogenous feeds that lack macronutrient profiles self-selected by the animals; this may play a role in promoting cannibalism in species like the yellow mealworm. Nutritional enrichments, such as dietary diversity, can support brain development in crickets but may not be provided depending on the farm's available feedstock. Poor hydration for some animals may result from an effort to control disease outbreaks/fungal growth in the feed.
Environment Many environmental factors will be critical for the welfare and productivity of insect farms. These include: temperature, humidity/moisture, light cycles, oxygen levels, and stocking densities or other spatial features of the environment.
For instance, larger cages and specific wavelengths of light are essential for the natural behaviors of adult black soldier fly breeders. Temperature and humidity must be carefully controlled or excess mortality, and putative welfare harms, will result for most insect species. Jagran raises housefly larvae for use as animal feed and report that humidity needs to be carefully controlled to avoid dehydrating or drowning the insects. Insects are poikilothermic, but maintaining an adequate temperature range remains important. For example, lethal overheating is a problem in black soldier fly and yellow mealworm larvae that are reared in dense aggregations within insulating substrates.
Although many farmed insects are naturally gregarious, when stocking densities are too high this can cause lethal overheating, increase aggression and cannibalism, or result in altered development and different behavioral needs that may be challenging to fulfill on farms. For instance, some crickets may develop longer wings in an effort to fly far and escape overcrowded conditions on farms; the inability to escape these conditions reduces natural behavioral expression and results in reports of aggression and cannibalism, as stated by one producer: "...they'll bite each other, they'll eat each other". These problems may also worsen over generations in captive conditions - rearing in captivity resulted in selection for increased aggression in crickets compared to wild populations.
Physical Health Viruses, bacteria, protists, fungi, and more may rapidly kill insects on farms. For example, Acheta domesticus densovirus resulted in millions of dollars in lost product and some farms losing their entire livestock population in outbreaks that have spanned 35 years of industry history in North America and the United States. Some insect diseases appear to be specific to single species or taxonomic groups within the insects, and thus may not spread between species, while others may be able to infect multiple farmed insect species if housed in the same facility.
Humans can carry diseases from the outside world to farmed insects. For instance, the company Van de Ven had a pathogen outbreak that killed all of its Zophobas morio beetle larvae, and the breeders hypothesized that the disease may have been brought by human visitors. Accordingly, the International Platform for Insects as Food and Feed have developed guidance on hygiene procedures for farms with the goal of protecting consumer and animal health. More integration of the veterinary and pathology communities, which are staples of traditional vertebrate animal farming, with the new insect farming sector may result in improved animal health, increased biosecurity, and better consumer protection over time.
Insects may be injured due to aggression or cannibalism. Low temperatures, disease, or poor nutrition may result in deformities during any stage of development. Stress may result from rough handling, washing and immersion in water, or transport (e.g., during shipping), which may in some cases contribute to mortality. Inbreeding depression can result in reduced physical health for farmed insects and producers generally make efforts to maintain a more genetically diverse population.
Insects may be fed toxin-contaminated grains or plastics/polymers that may reduce their health, depending on the level of inclusion and specific types of these ingredients used (though this is not expected to be common practice in the industry currently).
Behavior