The judiciary of Italy is one of the three branches of the Italian Republic under the constitution of 1948. Composed of a system of courts and public prosecutors' offices, the judiciary of Italy is tasked with the administration of justice. Both bench judges and public prosecutors, collectively called magistrates after the Roman tradition, hold office within this branch. The foundational attributes and roles of the Italian judiciary are delineated primarily by the Constitution of Italy, and are supplemented by statutes of constitutional significance.

In turn, magistrates are gathered in a collective body known as magistracy. Marked by an absence of internal hierarchy, the magistracy is also independent from any other branch of the state. In particular, the constitutional guarantee of independence protects career and honorary magistrates against the executive and legislative branches. In the Italian Republic, the government has no role in appointments or promotions, although the Minister of Justice oversees administrative resources and may request disciplinary proceedings. Career magistrates may serve until the mandatory retirement age of 70.

The Italian judiciary encompasses three independent judicial circuits. The ordinary judicial circuit handles civil and criminal matters. The specialised judicial circuit has exclusive jurisdiction over administrative, tax and audit matters. The military judicial circuit has jurisdiction over offences committed by service members in peacetime, although specific statutes provide broader attributions during wartime. The Constitutional Court of Italy lies outside the judiciary as an independent and separate constitutional institution tasked with reviewing the constitutionality of laws and settling conflicts among the branches of the state.

Law

General principles The Italian legal system operates within the civil law tradition with a foundation in Roman law principles. This system emphasises codified statutes and legal codes as primary sources of legal authority, contrasting with common law systems where judicial precedents are more influential. The law of Italy, deeply embedded within the civil law tradition, is characterised by a systematic and hierarchical arrangement of legal norms. This structure is influenced by foundational principles that include the rule of law, the protection of fundamental rights, and the separation of powers. Central to these principles is the notion of legal certainty whereby laws must be clear, publicised, and stable, facilitating compliance and enabling predictability in legal outcomes.

Sources of law In Italian law, sources are broadly classified into two categories: sources of cognisance and sources of production. Sources of cognisance are those through which the content of legal norms becomes known, including legal publications and official gazettes. Sources of production, on the other hand, are the mechanisms by which legal norms are created or modified. These include the Constitution, legislation, regulatory decrees, and international treaties.

Whilst the Constitution does not recognise case law as a formal source of law, it entrusts the judiciary, notably the , with the responsibility to ensure strict adherence to and impartial application of the law. Similarly, case law is not listed as one of the sources of law by Article 1 of the preliminary provisions to the Civil Code. Although courts are free to depart from previous rulings, settled interpretation of a provision will be normally upheld by lower courts. In particular, legal principles affirmed by the may have de facto authority over lower courts and, thereby, be deployed in court briefs and rulings for reasoning. The within the is entrusted with identifying and systemising the , namely, particularly important legal principles, for publication in the civil and criminal case reports.

Hierarchy of law The hierarchy of legal norms in Italy is anchored by Constitution of 1948, which is the supreme law of the land. It establishes the foundational legal framework and principles that guide the creation, interpretation, and application of all other legal norms. Below the Constitution, the hierarchy includes primary legislation (laws passed by the Parliament as well by regional assemblies), secondary legislation (regulations and decrees issued by the executive), and tertiary norms (local laws and regulations). The Constitutional Court has a monopoly over the constitutional review of legal sources, ensuring that in particular statutory laws and regulations comply with Italian constitutional law and certain rights and liberties such as those set forth in the European Convention on Human Rights.

Legal codification

The Italian Civil Code and the Italian Penal Code are central to statutory law. The Civil Code, significantly revised from its original 1865 enactment to the version introduced in 1942, addresses private law matters such as contracts, property, corporations and companies, labour, family relations, and inheritance. Originally, it incorporated influences from the German BGB and the Napoleonic civil code.

The Penal Code's evolution is particularly noteworthy. The first comprehensive Italian Penal Code, known as the "Zanardelli Code" named after former ministry Giuseppe Zanardelli, was enacted in 1889, featuring liberal principles including the abolition of the death penalty. In contrast, the 1930 Penal Code, often referred to as the "Rocco Code" after Minister of justice Alfredo Rocco, marked a shift in Italy's criminal law framework. This code reintroduced the death penalty and included provisions that emphasised state security and public order, reflecting the legal and social context of its time under the Fascist regime. Subsequent modifications to the Penal Code, especially following the adoption of the Constitution in 1948, have been aimed at aligning the legal system with the principles of democracy, human rights, and the rule of law.

Constitutional principles

Independence As stipulated in Article 104 of the Constitution of the Italian Republic, the judiciary operates as an autonomous branch of the state whose province is the interpretation and application of the law. Article 101 reinforces this autonomy, asserting that magistrates are bound solely by the law, thus insulating their decision-making from influence by other state powers or other magistrates' judicial decisions ("external independence"). This independence is further characterised by a non-hierarchical structure among magistrates, with distinctions made only based on the functions vested in them ("internal independence"), as per Article 107 paragraph 3. Public prosecutors offices are independent, and cannot be influenced by the legislative, executive or political power in general. Prosecutors have a legal monopoly over the initiation of criminal proceedings, thereby acting in full independence but endorsing some form of direct, or indirect, responsibility vis-à-vis the public.

Accountability Article 28 of the Constitution holds accountable public servants and employees of public bodies under criminal, civil and disciplinary laws for any act carried out to the detriment of citizens' rights. This accountability extends to the State and public entities involved in the administration of justice. Italian magistrates are not directly liable for acts owing to the exercise of judicial or prosecutorial functions. Law 117/1988 of 13 April 1988 applies the principles laid down in Article 28 of Constitution by allowing individuals to file a liability claim against the State where a magistrate willfully or carelessly carried out judicial or prosecutorial duties, or a denial a justice was brought about owing to the magistrate's conduct. In the event of liability, the State can claim reimbursement of damages to the concerned magistrate within the limit of one-third of annual salary.

Recruitment Access to the ordinary, administrative, tax or audit magistracy is differentiated. Article 106 of the Constitution only requires the organisation of a public examination to provide for the appointment of magistrates; the office is not subject to electoral appointment. Exceptionally, the High Council of the Judiciary is authorised, pursuant to Article 106 paragraph 2 of the Constitution, to appoint highly qualified university professors of law or lawyers as Councilor of Cassation (), who only operate within the .

Discipline and organisation

Judges and public prosecutors, once appointed, enjoy security of tenure, subject to removal only with their consent or by decision of their governing body, based on specific legal grounds. In order to sanction an Italian magistrate, the prosecuting body must ensure compliance with the due process of law clause. The High Council of the Judiciary, an institution of constitutional importance chaired by the President of the Italian Republic and effectively led by a vice-chair who is also a member of the Parliament plays a pivotal role in safeguarding the ordinary judiciary's independence. It oversees appointments, promotions, transfers, and disciplinary actions, as empowered by Article 105 of the Constitution.

Parallel to the ordinary judiciary, the special judiciary is governed by separate independent bodies. The administrative magistracy operates under its own governance, as outlined in Article 120 of the Constitution; likewise, the audit and tax magistracies are governed by distinct independent institutions. Governance of administrative magistrates is vested in the Managing Board of the administrative justice, established by ordinary law no. 205/2000, whereas audit and tax magistrates' governance fall under the purview of the Presidency Council of the Court of Auditors and the Supreme Council of Tax Justice, respectively.

Courts

The two main courts foreseen by the Italian Constitution are the and the . The former operates within the judiciary framework, particularly guided by the principles set forth in Article 111 of the Constitution, functioning as Italy's apex court in the system of appeals. This court is mandated by law to ensure the exact and uniform application of the law in disputes pending before Italian courts, exclusive of fact-related issues. However, as per Article 101 of the Constitution, which states, "The justice is administered in the name of the people. Judges are subject only to the law," the decisions of the , while highly authoritative and persuasive, do not have formal binding precedent. In reality, the principles set forth by this court bind the court where a case is remanded and, to some extent, inform the application of the interpreted provisions in similar future cases.

The , explicitly referred to in Article 100 of the Constitution, fulfills a twofold role. It acts as an advisory body to the executive, ensuring lawful administrative action, and as an administrative court, it protects citizens' rights against public administration, ensuring that administrative decisions comply with legal standards. In the Italian legal system, the (Council of State) is a body of constitutional significance. As per Article 103 of the Constitution, the must remain neutral vis-à-vis the Italian public administration.

Procedural principles The Constitution articulates several principles that define the judiciary's legal framework and prerogatives. Judges must be predetermined by law, as mandated by Article 25, ensuring that no judge is specially appointed to a case, thereby safeguarding judicial impartiality. Moreover, Article 102 paragraph 2 prohibits the establishment of extraordinary or special tribunals, reinforcing the judiciary's consistency and independence. The Italian judiciary has also authority over the Italian judicial police, integrating its role in the enforcement of law and order within the Italian legal system.

Legal status General provisions