An important problem in topology is how to enlarge a space by adding points so that certain kinds of limits exist. The Stone–Čech compactification of a space provides the most extensive such enlargement: it adds enough points to ensure the existence of all generalized limits, including those detected by nets or ultrafilters rather than ordinary sequences. The construction was implicitly introduced by Andrey Nikolayevich Tikhonov (1930) and explicitly described by Marshall Stone (1937) and Eduard Čech (1937).
In more detail, the Stone–Čech compactification is a technique for constructing a universal map from a topological space to a compact Hausdorff space . The Stone–Čech compactification is the unique "most general" compact Hausdorff space generated by , in the sense that any continuous map from into any other compact Hausdorff space factors uniquely through . If the space is a Tychonoff space, the map from to is an embedding, and can be identified as a dense subspace of . For a Tychonoff space, is the largest compactification of : any other Hausdorff compactification of is a quotient space of . For infinite spaces, the structure of is often extremely complex, and proving its existence generally requires the axiom of choice.
Motivation The goal of compactification is to "enlarge" a space by adding idealized limit points to fill in any "holes" or missing boundaries. Because compact spaces are mathematically well-behaved, it is often useful to embed a non-compact space into a compact one. There are often multiple ways to add these points, depending on how the original space is embedded into a larger framework. Extension of continuous functions A primary motivation for the Stone–Čech compactification is to ensure that arbitrary bounded continuous functions on the original space can be extended to the compactification. For example, the open interval is usually compactified into the closed interval by adding two endpoints. However, continuous functions on might not extend to . If the interval is embedded into the plane by mapping to (the "topologist's sine curve"), the closure adds an entire vertical line segment of limit points rather than a single point. In that embedding, the value of can be recovered simply using the projection onto the second coordinate, which naturally extends to the closure. This observation leads to the product space construction of the Stone–Čech compactification. If adding one function as a coordinate allows that specific function to extend continuously, then embedding the space into a high-dimensional product space—with one coordinate for every possible bounded continuous function—allows all such functions to extend. The Stone–Čech compactification, denoted , is the closure of the space X within this maximal product space. Because it is constructed to accommodate every possible continuous extension, is characterized by a universal property: every bounded continuous function on X extends uniquely to a continuous function on . Comparison with one-point compactification Another motivation is to avoid the restrictiveness of smaller compactifications. For an uncountably infinite discrete space , the one-point compactification results in a space where a function is continuous if and only if it is constant everywhere except on a countable subset of . In the original discrete space, every function was continuous; the one-point compactification "destroys" the continuity of the vast majority of functions. By contrast, the Stone–Čech compactification is the compactification where all bounded functions extend to continuous functions on . It is much larger than the one-point compactification; while adds only a single point, adds uncountably many.
History
Andrey Nikolayevich Tikhonov introduced completely regular spaces in 1930 in order to avoid the pathological situation of Hausdorff spaces whose only continuous real-valued functions are constant maps.
In the same 1930 article where Tychonoff defined completely regular spaces, he also proved that every Tychonoff space (i.e. Hausdorff completely regular space) has a Hausdorff compactification (in this same article, he also proved Tychonoff's theorem). In 1937, Čech extended Tychonoff's technique and introduced the notation βX for this compactification. Stone also constructed βX in a 1937 article, although using a very different method. Despite Tychonoff's article being the first work on the subject of the Stone–Čech compactification and despite Tychonoff's article being referenced by both Stone and Čech, Tychonoff's name is rarely associated with βX.
Universal property and functoriality
The Stone–Čech compactification of the topological space X is a compact Hausdorff space βX together with a continuous map iX : X → βX that has the following universal property: any continuous map f : X → K, where K is a compact Hausdorff space, extends uniquely to a continuous map βf : βX → K, i.e. ()iX = f.
As is usual for universal properties, this universal property characterizes βX up to homeomorphism.
As is outlined in , below, one can prove (using the axiom of choice) that such a Stone–Čech compactification iX : X → βX exists for every topological space X. Furthermore, the image iX(X) is dense in βX.
Some authors add the assumption that the starting space X be Tychonoff (or even locally compact Hausdorff), for the following reasons: The map from X to its image in βX is a homeomorphism if and only if X is Tychonoff. The map from X to its image in βX is a homeomorphism to an open subspace if and only if X is locally compact Hausdorff. The Stone–Čech construction can be performed for more general spaces X, but in that case the map X → βX need not be a homeomorphism to the image of X (and sometimes is not even injective).
As is usual for universal constructions like this, the extension property makes β a functor from Top (the category of topological spaces) to CHaus (the category of compact Hausdorff spaces). Further, if we let U be the inclusion functor from CHaus into Top, maps from βX to K (for K in CHaus) correspond bijectively to maps from X to UK (by considering their restriction to X and using the universal property of βX). i.e. Hom(βX, K) ≅ Hom(X, UK), which means that β is left adjoint to U. This implies that CHaus is a reflective subcategory of Top with reflector β.
Examples If X is a compact Hausdorff space, then it coincides with its Stone–Čech compactification.
The Stone–Čech compactification of the first uncountable ordinal , with the order topology, is the ordinal . The Stone–Čech compactification of the deleted Tychonoff plank is the Tychonoff plank. These examples do not require the axiom of choice.
Constructions
Construction using products One attempt to construct the Stone–Čech compactification of X is to take the closure of the image of X in
where the product is over all maps from X to compact Hausdorff spaces K (or, equivalently, the image of X by the right Kan extension of the identity functor of the category CHaus of compact Hausdorff spaces along the inclusion functor of CHaus into the category Top of general topological spaces).Refer to Example 4.6.12 for an explicit left adjoint construction, or to Proposition 6.5.2 for how left adjoints can be seen as right Kan extensions in By Tychonoff's theorem this product of compact spaces is compact, and the closure of X in this space is therefore also compact. This works intuitively but fails for the technical reason that the collection of all such maps is a proper class rather than a set. There are several ways to modify this idea to make it work; for example, one can restrict the compact Hausdorff spaces K to have underlying set P(P(X)) (the power set of the power set of X), which is sufficiently large that it has cardinality at least equal to that of every compact Hausdorff space to which X can be mapped with dense image.
Construction using the unit interval One way of constructing βX is to let C be the set of all continuous functions from X into [0, 1] and consider the map where
This may be seen to be a continuous map onto its image, if [0, 1]C is given the product topology. By Tychonoff's theorem we have that [0, 1]C is compact since [0, 1] is. Consequently, the closure of X in [0, 1]C is a compactification of X.
In fact, this closure is the Stone–Čech compactification. To verify this, we just need to verify that the closure satisfies the appropriate universal property. We do this first for K = [0, 1], where the desired extension of f : X → [0, 1] is just the projection onto the f coordinate in [0, 1]C. In order to then get this for general compact Hausdorff K we use the above to note that K can be embedded in some cube, extend each of the coordinate functions and then take the product of these extensions.
The special property of the unit interval needed for this construction to work is that it is a cogenerator of the category of compact Hausdorff spaces: this means that if A and B are compact Hausdorff spaces, and f and g are distinct maps from A to B, then there is a map h : B → [0, 1] such that hf and hg are distinct. Any other cogenerator (or cogenerating set) can be used in this construction.
Construction using ultrafilters
Alternatively, if is discrete, then it is possible to construct as the set of all ultrafilters on , with the elements of corresponding to the principal ultrafilters. The topology on the set of ultrafilters, known as the , is generated by sets of the form for a subset of .
Again we verify the universal property: For with compact Hausdorff and an ultrafilter on we have an ultrafilter base on , the pushforward of . This has a unique limit because is compact Hausdorff, say , and we define This may be verified to be a continuous extension of .
Equivalently, one can take the Stone space of the complete Boolean algebra of all subsets of as the Stone–Čech compactification. This is really the same construction, as the Stone space of this Boolean algebra is the set of ultrafilters (or equivalently prime ideals, or homomorphisms to the 2-element Boolean algebra) of the Boolean algebra, which is the same as the set of ultrafilters on .
The construction can be generalized to arbitrary Tychonoff spaces by using maximal filters of zero sets instead of ultrafilters.W.W. Comfort, S. Negrepontis, The Theory of Ultrafilters, Springer, 1974. (Filters of closed sets suffice if the space is normal.)
Construction using C*-algebras The Stone–Čech compactification is naturally homeomorphic to the spectrum of Cb(X).This is Stone's original construction. Here Cb(X) denotes the C*-algebra of all continuous bounded complex-valued functions on X with sup-norm. Notice that Cb(X) is canonically isomorphic to the multiplier algebra of C0(X).
The Stone–Čech compactification of the natural numbers In the case where X is locally compact, e.g. N or R, the image of X forms an open subset of βX, or indeed of any compactification, (this is also a necessary condition, as an open subset of a compact Hausdorff space is locally compact). In this case one often studies the remainder of the space, . This is a closed subset of βX, and so is compact. We consider N with its discrete topology and write (but this does not appear to be standard notation for general X).
As explained above, one can view βN as the set of ultrafilters on N, with the topology generated by sets of the form for U a subset of N. The set N corresponds to the set of principal ultrafilters, and the set N* to the set of free ultrafilters.
The study of βN, and in particular N*, is a major area of modern set-theoretic topology. The major results motivating this are Parovicenko's theorems, essentially characterising its behaviour under the assumption of the continuum hypothesis.
These state: