The Association on American Indian Affairs (originally the American Indian Defense Association) is a nonprofit human rights charity located in Rockville, Maryland. Founded in 1922, it is dedicated to protecting the rights of Native Americans.
History The Association was created by an amalgamation of several non-profit Indian organizations that emerged in the early 1920s. The Eastern Association on Indian Affairs and the New Mexican Association on American Indian Affairs were the first of the predecessor groups to formally organize in 1922. The EAIA and NMAAI members were affluent non-Natives, most of who owned land in Santa Fe and aimed to protect Pueblo culture. The American Indian Defense Association, headed by John Collier, was established to oppose the Bursum and the Leavitt Bills, both of which sought to end Pueblo ties to their lands and outlaw cultural practices. These groups merged in the 1930s and eventually consolidated under the name the Association on American Indian Affairs. Today, the Association has an all-Native Board of Directors and Executive Director. Over the years, the Association has waged innumerable battles, touching on the material and spiritual well-being of Indians throughout Indian Country.
Association timeline
1922 AAIA is formed as the Eastern Association on Indian Affairs
1922 AAIA helps Pueblos protect land and water rights
1944 AAIA helps to establish the National Congress of American IndiansI
1947 First college scholarship awarded and formalized its scholarship program a year later
1956 AAIA establishes Field Health Nursing program
1964-1970 AAIA works to protect Taos Blue Lake
1968 AAIA begins effort to prevent Otitis Media on Indian reservations
1971 Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act enacted
1978 Indian Child Welfare Act, legislation AAIA helped draft, signed into law
1982 AAIA President Ortiz honored by MacArthur Foundation
1984 Tribal Government Tax Status Act becomes law
1986 Landmark Washington Indian Child Welfare tribal-state agreement signed
1990 Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act enacted
1991 The Medicine Wheel Coalition for the Protection of Sacred Sites established
1994 Amendments to American Indian Religious Freedom Act approved
1994 Reaffirmation of the Ione Band of Miwok Indians by the federal government
1996 Bighorn Medicine Wheel Historic Preservation plan adopted
1998 First AAIA-sponsored diabetes conference takes place
2000 AAIA expands grants to summer camps
2006 AAIA creates Dakotah-language Scrabble game and hosts first tournament
2007 Dakotah language K-12 curriculum completed
2008 Tribal amendments to Title IV-E Foster Care and Adoption Assistance Act approved in Fostering Connections for Success and Increasing Adoptions Act
Programs AAIA offers undergraduate and graduate scholarships to students from federally recognized and non-recognized tribes. It aims to protect and ensure appropriate implementation of the Indian Child Welfare Act, which it helped to draft and enact in 1978 to protect Indian children at risk of being placed in foster care or for adoption. Additionally, the Association collaborates with Tribes and traditional Indian religious petitioners to protect sacred lands such as the Bighorn Medicine Wheel in Wyoming. It also partners with Tribes to educate Native people about diabetes and health-related issues. AAIA played a key role in enacting the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act and continues to support efforts to repatriate human remains and funerary and sacred objects to their tribes. Moreover, it provides funds for youth summer camps focusing on culture, language, substance abuse, and health and wellness focus. The Association strives to preserve Native languages, focusing on the Dakotah language.
Youth
Indian Child Welfare Act
The Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) is a federal law that seeks to preserve Native American families and keep American Indian children who must be placed out of the home with American Indian families whenever possible. The United States Congress passed ICWA in 1978 in response to the alarmingly high number of Indian children being removed from their homes by both public and private agencies. The intent of Congress under ICWA was to "protect the best interests of Indian children and to promote the stability and security of Indian tribes and families" (25 U.S.C. § 1902). ICWA sets federal requirements that apply to state child custody proceedings involving an Indian child who is a member of or eligible for membership in a federally recognized tribe.
The Association's advocacy and research served as a catalyst for passing the Act. AAIA's initial activities were to represent Indian parents whose children had been wrongfully removed from them, beginning with a case involving the Devils Lake Sioux Tribe.United States Senate (1977) Select Committee on Indian Affairs.Indian Child Welfare Act of 1977. Hearing on S.1214 to establish standards for the placement of Indian children in foster or adoptive homes, to prevent the breakup of Indian families, and for other purposes. 95th Congress, 1st Session. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Later, AAIA conducted a survey of states with large Indian populations in 1969 and again in 1974. The study revealed that approximately 25–35 percent of all Indian children were being separated from their families and placed in foster homes, adoptive homes, or institutions. The Association advocated for the passage of ICWA throughout the 1970s. William Byler, the Executive Director of AAIA in 1974, was the lead witness at the first hearing on Indian child welfare. Following this, AAIA worked with Congress to draft the legislation.
Since its passage, the Association has continued to protect ICWA and work to ensure appropriate implementation through litigation, advocacy, and training. These actions have included legal participation in the Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl and Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield United States Supreme Court cases, working to develop tribal-state agreements and state legislation in several states, and contributing to the ICWA guidebook published by the Native American Rights Fund. To assist tribes more directly, the Association also created A Survey and Analysis of Tribal-State Indian Child Welfare Act Agreements, Including Promising Practices, which can provide a detailed analysis of current Tribal-State ICWA agreements. These agreements determine the relationship between states and tribes beyond the minimum requirements ICWA provides. Without these agreements, important communication between state and tribal officials may not occur, potentially undermining the provisions provided by ICWA and putting Indian children unnecessarily at risk.
In 2019, the ICWA once again came under attack in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals via Brackeen v. Bernhardt. AAIA joined 56 Tribal organizations, 325 Indian Nations, 21 state attorneys general, 20 law schools, and 30 child welfare organizations to file an amicus curiae ("friend of the court") brief in support of the Indian Child Welfare Act, drawing attention to the numerous abuses that led to the bill’s passage in the first place. While the Fifth Circuit initially ruled in favor of protecting the Act, on November 7, 2019, it ordered the case to be reheard en banc (heard before all judges of the Fifth Circuit) with oral argument. Following this news, AAIA, the Native American Rights Fund (NARF), the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI), and the National Indian Child Welfare Association (NICWA) together created the #ProtectICWA campaign and filed a new amicus brief with 486 federally recognized American Indian and Alaska Native Tribes and 55 other Native organizations.
Juvenile Justice In recent years, the Association has partnered with the Annie E. Casey Foundation and the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative to better understand how juvenile detention centers affect Native youth and to provide recommendations on how these systems can be altered to better serve the young people within them and for society as a whole.
The studies associated with this initiative revealed that, in many cases, there was no real system to identify Native youth, and the youth had to choose to self-identify as Native American to have their proper status recorded. This often led to underreporting of the number of Native youths within these systems since many individuals did not want to alert their home communities to these situations due to feelings of embarrassment or shame. As such, many Juvenile Detention sites do not contact the youth’s affiliated Tribe when brought in for an indiscretion. Instead, they are placed in state systems of punishment rather than receiving the culturally appropriate services offered by their Tribe. These tribal services are proven to produce better outcomes than the state’s alternatives.
The Association used the information compiled in this report to develop recommendations for improving this system. Their aim is to protect Native youth from unnecessary and often counterproductive incarceration, reduce trauma amongst Native youth, and lower rates of recidivism to promote a healthier overall society. These recommendations are as follows:
"Develop uniform and consistent protocols for identifying Native youth by Tribal affiliation, in collaboration with Tribes, that are not dependent on the youth’s self-identification or a unilateral assessment based on physical characteristics." "Develop consistent data points to be collected regarding Native youth that includes Tribal affiliation, and base decision-making on the responsible collection of this data, in collaboration with families and Tribes." "Establish notification protocols, in collaboration with Tribes, for informing Tribes when a Native youth enters the juvenile justice system." "DAI sites that regularly interact with Native youth populations should receive concentrated education and training to develop a deeper level of understanding about the circumstances, issues and needs of Native youth involved in the juvenile justice system, in partnership with Tribes and Tribal programs. Other JDAI sites should receive basic universal education about Native American youth and opportunities to support those Native youth." "States and Tribes should execute Memoranda of Understanding for all child welfare and juvenile justice matters. State court and juvenile justice staff should enter into process-driven agreements with Tribal juvenile justice staff and Tribal courts that include provisions regarding how to transfer Native youth to Tribal courts or to Tribal juvenile justice programs; how to identify Native youth; and how to access applicable programming and funding that supports Tribal cultures and traditions." "Explore the availability of relevant cultural programs and detention alternatives based on Tribal juvenile justice programs, as well as Tribal traditions and practices."
Since the publication of this report, AAIA has worked to raise awareness of the problem and facilitate discussion between Tribes, states, and localities on the effectiveness of juvenile detention policies and possible improvements. The Association also continues its work with the Annie E. Casey Foundation to train state and local youth justice workers to serve Native Youth and their communities for improved outcomes.
Scholarships The Association began offering scholarships to Native American students attending undergraduate and graduate institutions in 1947. These students must be members of a tribal nation in the United States, regardless of whether the tribe is federally recognized. These scholarships are meant to support Native Americans who are strongly connected to their Tribal Nation and Indian Country, regardless of how long they have been in college or their age.