The Boro–Garo languages are a branch of Sino-Tibetan languages, spoken primarily in Northeast India and parts of Bangladesh.
The Boro–Garo languages form five groups: Boro, Rabha, Garo, Koch and Deori. Boro–Garo languages were historically very widespread throughout the Brahmaputra Valley and in what are now the northern parts of Bangladesh,Note: English translation of the French original: Jacquesson, François (2006). ‘La reconstruction linguistique du passé: Le cas des language Boro-Garo’. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 101(1): 273–303. and it is speculated that the proto-Boro-Garo language was the lingua franca of the Brahmaputra valley before it was replaced by Assamese, to which it has made major contributions.
Branches
The Boro-Garo languages were identified in the Grierson's Language Survey of India, and the names of the languages and their modern equivalents are given below in the table. Name in LSI Modern names Bodo Boro Lalung Tiwa Dimasa Dimasa Garo Garo Koch Koch Rabha Rabha Tripuri Kokborok Chutiya Deori Moran Moran (since extinct)
Sub groups The Boro-Garo languages have been further divided into four subgroups by Burling. Rabha (Kochic) languages: Atong, Koch, Ruga, Rabha Garo languages: Garo, Megam Bodo languages: Bodo, Dimasa, Barman, Tiwa, Kokborok (Tripuri), Kachari, Moran Deori language
Old Hajong may have been a Bodo–Garo language.
Barman is a recently discovered Bodo–Garo language.A brief linguistic sketch of the Barman Thar (Language). Tezpur University.
Boro is an associate official language of the state of Assam. Kokborok (Tripuri) is one of the official languages of the state of Tripura. Garo is an associate official language of Meghalaya. Megam has been strongly influenced by Khasic languages, while Deori-Chutia by the Idu Mishmi language.
Languages of the family feature verb-final word order. There is some flexibility in the order of the arguments, but a nominative–accusative distinction is marked with post-nominal clitics. The languages also prefix classifiers to numerals modifying nouns. tense, aspect and mood are indicated using verbal suffixes.
Origins The linkage of the Boro–Garo languages with Konyak and Jingphaw languages suggest that proto-Boro-Garo entered Assam from somewhere to the northeast. It has been proposed that the proto-Boro-Garo language was a lingua franca of different linguistic communities, not all of who were native speakers,"Briefly, I propose, following a suggestion by Burling (2007), that the Proto-Boro-Garo first as a lingua franca used for communication across the various linguistic communicates of the region and its striking simplicity and transparency reflect a period when it was widely spoken by communities for whom it was not a native language." and that it began as a creolized lingua franca. This would account for the highly reduced morphology of Boro–Garo, with what morphology is present mostly being regular, loosely bound, and with transparent etymology, typical signs of recent origin.
Classification Joseph & Burling (2006)
Joseph & Burling (2006:1-2) classify the Boro–Garo languages into four major groups. Wood (2008:6) also follows this classification. Deori Boro languages: Boro, Kokborok, Tiwa Garo Rabha (Kochic) languages: Koch, Rabha, Wanang, Atong, and Ruga
Jacquesson (2006) Jacquesson (2017:112) classifies the Boro-Garo languages as follows, and recognizes three major branches (Western, Central, and Eastern). The Koch languages and Garo are grouped together as Western Boro-Garo. Western Garo, Rabha, Koch Central Boro, Mech Kaubru Dimasa, Moran Kokborok Eastern Deori
Jacquesson (2017) believes that the Boro–Garo languages had arrived in their present location from the southeast, and notes similarities shared with Zeme languages and Kuki-Chin languages.
Reconstruction Proto-Boro–Garo has been reconstructed by Joseph and Burling (2006) and by Wood (2008).
See also List of Proto-Boro-Garo reconstructions (Wiktionary) Reang
Notes
References
Joseph, U.V., and Burling, Robbins. 2006. Comparative phonology of the Boro Garo languages. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages Publication.
Further reading