("the inhuman woman"L'Inhumaine was shown in 1926 in the USA under the title The New Enchantment.) is a 1924 French science fiction drama film directed by Marcel L'Herbier. It has the subtitle ("fairy story", "story of enchantment"). is notable for its experimental techniques and for the collaboration of many leading practitioners in the decorative arts, architecture and music. The film caused controversy on its release.
Background In 1923, while seeking to recover his health after a bout of typhoid, and his fortunes following the collapse of his film adaptation of Résurrection, Marcel L'Herbier received a proposal from his old friend the opera singer Georgette Leblanc to make a film in which she would star and for which she would secure partial funding from American financiers. L'Herbier revived a scenario which he had written under the title La Femme de glace (Woman of Ice); when Leblanc declared this to be too abstract for her liking and for American taste, he enlisted Pierre Mac Orlan to revise it according to Leblanc's suggestions, and in its new form it became L'Inhumaine.Jaque Catelain, Jaque Catelain présente Marcel L'Herbier. (Paris: E. Jacques Vautrain, 1950). p. 76. The agreement with Leblanc committed her to provide 50% of the costs (envisaged as FF130,000), and she would distribute and promote the film in the United States under the title The New Enchantment. The remainder of the production costs were met by L'Herbier's own production company Cinégraphic.Marcel L'Herbier, La Tête qui tourne. (Paris: Belfond, 1979). pp. 100–102.
The plot of the film was a melodrama with strong elements of fantasy, but from the outset L'Herbier's principal interest lay in the style of filming: he wanted to present "a miscellany of modern art" in which many contributors would bring different creative styles into a single aesthetic goal.Marcel L'Herbier, La Tête qui tourne. (Paris: Belfond, 1979). p. 102. In this respect L'Herbier was exploring ideas similar to those outlined by the critic and film theorist Ricciotto Canudo who wrote a number of texts about the relationship between cinema and the other arts, proposing that cinema could be seen as "a synthesis of all the arts".For a discussion of Canudo's influence upon L'Inhumaine, see Prosper Hillairet, "L'Inhumaine, L'Herbier, Canudo, et le synthèse des arts", in Marcel L'Herbier: l'art du cinéma, ed. by Laurent Véray. (Paris: Association française du recherche sur l'histoire du cinéma, 2007) pp.101-108. Ricciotto Canudo died while L'Inhumaine was in production and did not see the completed film. L'Herbier also foresaw that his film could provide a prologue or introduction to the major exhibition Exposition des Arts Décoratifs which was due to open in Paris in 1925. With this in mind, L'Herbier invited leading French practitioners in painting, architecture, fashion, dance and music to collaborate with him (see "Production", below). He described the project as "this fairy story of modern decorative art"."...cette histoire féerique de l'Art décoratif moderne". Marcel L'Herbier, La Tête qui tourne. (Paris: Belfond, 1979). p. 102.
Synopsis
Famous singer Claire Lescot, who lives on the outskirts of Paris, is courted by many men, including a maharajah, Djorah de Nopur, and a young Swedish scientist, Einar Norsen. At her lavish parties she enjoys their amorous attentions but she remains emotionally aloof and heartlessly taunts them. She announces her intention to leave on a trip around the world. When she is told that Norsen has killed himself because of her, she shows no feelings. At her next concert she is booed by an audience outraged at her coldness. She visits the vault in which Norsen's body lies, and as she admits her feelings for him she discovers that he is alive; his death was feigned. Norsen demonstrates one of his inventions which allows Claire to broadcast her singing while observing on a television screen the reaction of audiences around the world. Djorah is jealous of their new relationship and causes Claire to be bitten by a poisonous snake. Her body is brought to Norsen's laboratory, where he, by means of his scientific inventions, restores Claire to life.
Cast Georgette Leblanc as Claire Lescot Jaque Catelain as Einar Norsen Léonid Walter de Malte as Wladimir Kranine Fred Kellerman as Frank Mahler Philippe Hériat as Djorah de Nopur Marcelle Pradot as The simpleton
Production Filming began in September 1923 at the Joinville studios in Paris and had to be carried on at great speed because Georgette Leblanc was committed to return to America in mid-October for a concert tour. L'Herbier often continued shooting through the night, making intense demands on his cast and crew.Jaque Catelain, Jaque Catelain présente Marcel L'Herbier. (Paris: E. Jacques Vautrain, 1950). p. 77. In the event, Leblanc had to leave before everything was finished and some scenes could only be completed when she returned to Paris in spring 1924.Marcel L'Herbier, La Tête qui tourne. (Paris: Belfond, 1979). p. 105.
One evening of location shooting became famous (4 October 1923). For the scene of Claire Lescot's concert L'Herbier hired the Théâtre des Champs-Élysées and invited over 2000 people from the film world and fashionable society to attend in evening dress and to play the part of an unruly audience. Ten cameras were deployed around the theatre to record their reactions to the concert.Jaque Catelain, Jaque Catelain présente Marcel L'Herbier. (Paris: E. Jacques Vautrain, 1950). p. 79. L'Herbier mentions only three cameras in "La Tête qui tourne", p. 104. This included the American pianist George Antheil performing some of his own dissonant compositions which created a suitably confrontational mood, and when Georgette Leblanc appeared on stage the audience responded with the required tumult of whistles, applause and protests, as well as some scuffles. The audience is said to have included Erik Satie, Pablo Picasso, Man Ray, Léon Blum, James Joyce, Ezra Pound and the Prince of Monaco.Prosper Hillairet, "L'Inhumaine, L'Herbier, Canudo, et le synthèse des arts", in Marcel L'Herbier: l'art du cinéma, ed. by Laurent Véray. (Paris: Association française du recherche sur l'histoire du cinéma, 2007) p. 105.George Antheil gave his own account of the occasion in: Bad Boy of Music (London; New York: Hurst & Blackett, 1945) pp. 134–135.
A wide range of practitioners in different fields of the arts worked on the film, meeting L'Herbier's ambition of creating a film which united many forms of artistic expression. Four designers contributed to the sets. The painter Fernand Léger created the mechanical laboratory of Einar Norsen.Léger's contribution to the design of L'Inhumaine, and its relationship to his own film Ballet mécanique, is discussed at length by Standish D. Lawder in The Cubist Cinema (New York: New York University Press, 1975) pp. 99–115. The architect Robert Mallet-Stevens designed the exteriors of the houses of Norsen and Claire Lescot, with strong cubist elements. Alberto Cavalcanti and Claude Autant-Lara, soon to be directing their own films, both had a background in design; Autant-Lara was responsible for the winter-garden set and the funeral vault, while Cavalcanti designed the geometric dining hall for Claire's party, with its dining-table set on an island in the middle of a pool.Richard Abel, French cinema: the first wave 1915-1929. (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984). pp. 387–389. Costumes were designed by Paul Poiret, furniture by Pierre Chareau and Michel Dufet, jewellery by Raymond Templier, and other "objets" by René Lalique and Jean Puiforcat. The choreographed scenes were provided by Jean Börlin and the Ballets Suédois. To bind the whole together L'Herbier commissioned the young Darius Milhaud to write a score with extensive use of percussion, to which the images were to be edited. (This musical score which was central to L'Herbier's conception of the film has not survived.Madeleine Milhaud [?] told film music historian Theodore van Houten in 1982 that the music for the Léger laboratory scene ended up in the short Concerto for percussion and small orchestra, op. 109, published 1930. [No further source identified].) The final sequence of the film, in which Claire is 'resurrected', is an elaborate exercise in rapid cutting, whose expressive possibilities had recently been demonstrated in La Roue. In addition to the juxtaposition and rhythmic repetition of images, L'Herbier interspersed frames of bright colours, intending to create counterpoint to the music of Milhaud and "to make the light sing"."...pour faire chanter la lumière." Marcel L'Herbier, La Tête qui tourne. (Paris: Belfond, 1979). p.105.
Reception L'Inhumaine received its first public screenings in November 1924, and its reception with the public and with critics was largely negative. It also became a financial disaster for L'Herbier's production company Cinégraphic.Richard Abel, French cinema: the first wave 1915-1929. (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984). p. 383. One of the film's stars drew a vivid picture of the impact which it had among Parisian audiences during its run at the Madeleine-Cinéma:
At each screening, spectators insulted each other, and there were as many frenzied partisans of the film as there were furious opponents. It was amid genuine uproar that, at every performance, there passed across the screen the multicoloured and syncopated images with which the film ends. Women, with hats askew, demanded their money back; men, with their faces screwed up, tumbled out on to the pavement where sometimes fist-fights continued.Jaque Catelain, Jaque Catelain présente Marcel L'Herbier. (Paris: E. Jacques Vautrain, 1950). p. 82. "A chaque séance, les spectateurs s'insultent, il y a autant de partisans frénétiques que d'adversaires acharnés. C'est dans un véritable vacarme que passent sur l'écran, à toutes les représentations, les images multicolores et syncopées sur lesquelles se termine le film. Des femmes, le chapeau de travers, exigent d'ètre remboursées; des hommes, les traits convulsés, se précipitent sur le trottoir où, parfois, les pugilats continuent..."
Criticism was levelled at the old-fashioned scenario and at the inexpressive performances of the principal actors,Georges Sadoul, Le Cinéma français (1890-1962). (Paris: Flammarion, 1962) p. 28. but the most contentious aspects were the film's visual and technical innovations. According to the critic Léon Moussinac, "There are many inventions, but they count too much for themselves and not enough for the film".Léon Moussinac, in Le Crapouillot [journal], quoted in Marcel L'Herbier: l'art du cinéma, ed. by Laurent Véray. (Paris: Association française du recherche sur l'histoire du cinéma, 2007) p. 358.
Many film historians and critics have ridiculed L'Inhumaine as a misguided attempt to celebrate film as art or to reconcile the popular and the élitist. On the other hand, it was precisely the originality and daring of L'Herbier's concept which won the enthusiasm of the film's admirers, such as the architect Adolf Loos: "It is a brilliant song on the greatness of modern technique. ...The final images of L'Inhumaine surpass the imagination. As you emerge from seeing it, you have the impression of having lived through the moment of birth of a new art."Adolf Loos, in Neue Freie Presse, 29 July 1924, quoted in Marcel L'Herbier, La Tête qui tourne. (Paris: Belfond, 1979). p.105. "C'est une chanson éclatante sur la grandeur de la technique moderne. ...La réalisation des dernières images de L'Inhumaine dépasse l'imagination. En sortant de la voir, on a l'impression d'avoir vécu l'heure de la naissance d'un nouvel art." A modern commentator has echoed this view more concisely in describing the film as "fabulously inventive".Dudley Andrew, Mists of regret. (Princeton University Press, 1995) p. 157.