Pride Toronto is an annual event held in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, in June each year to celebrate the LGBTQ community in the Greater Toronto Area. The centre of the festival is the city's Church and Wellesley village, while the parade and marches are primarily routed along the nearby Yonge Street, Gerrard Street and Bloor Street. In 2014, the event served as the fourth international WorldPride.
The first parade occurred in June 1981. For most of its history, Pride was a seven-to-ten day festival centred on the final week in June, with the parade falling on either the last weekend in June or the first weekend in July depending on the year's circumstances. Since 2016, the entire month of June has been declared Pride month, with a program of events throughout the month leading up to the parade.
The event is the second largest Pride in the world with almost 3 million attendees every year.
History
Toronto's Pride Week evolved out of the mass protests that followed the 1981 Toronto bathhouse raids, and celebrated its 25th anniversary in 2005. In the 2005 parade, newly appointed Toronto police chief Bill Blair became the first chief of police in the city's history to personally take part in the parade. He marched alongside politicians of all parties, including several federal and provincial cabinet ministers and Mayor David Miller.
Pride Toronto officials said that Pride Week 2009 drew an estimated one million people to Toronto and contributed to the city's economy, and state that they expect WorldPride to be significantly bigger."Toronto To Host World Pride In 2014" . CityNews, October 18, 2009. The actual numbers turned out to be closer to 2 million visitors. Economic impact was first reported at $286 million in 2014 and later updated to $719 million.
Controversies Commercialization and marginalization Toronto Pride Week has not been without controversy, as the growth of the event in recent years has led to allegations that it has become an overly commercial enterprise dependent on corporate sponsors and business interests, to the detriment of local community groups and political activism."LGBT Night March decries Pride's corporate sponsorship". Toronto Star, June 28, 2016. Although Pride officially defines itself as inclusive of all races, communities and gender identifications, many such groups within the LGBTQ community have alleged that their events and communities and issues are increasingly marginalized in favour of a commercialized agenda."Critics call for fewer corporate sponsors in future Toronto Pride parades". Metro, August 31, 2016. For example, many smaller community groups have indicated that they can no longer afford the increased fees required to place a marching contingent in the parade, which is increasingly dominated by corporate-sponsored advertising floats; and many LGBTQ-owned small businesses which historically depended on vendor booths at Pride Toronto for publicity have indicated that they can no longer afford the increased fees for inclusion in the vendor area."Tonight's Night March seeks to put focus on LGBTQ issues over commercialism". 680 News, June 27, 2016.
As early as 2010 the Blackness Yes! committee, which organizes an annual dance party called Blockorama for LGBTQ people of colour, was raising the alarm that their program was being involuntarily forced to move from its traditional space, the Wellesley Stage across from Wellesley subway station, to unsuitable spaces such as the smaller parking lot in front of the Church Street Beer Store, the unpaved and unsuitable-for-dancing George Hislop Park, or the far too small Alexander Street Parkette."Yet another Pride scandal: The marginalization of 'Blackness Yes!'". This Magazine, July 2, 2010.
In 2015, Pride Toronto was forced to withdraw applications to trademark the phrases "Dyke March" and "Trans Pride", both referring to events which are organized by outside groups on Pride weekend as a reaction to lesbian and transgender people's concerns that their issues and needs are not adequately addressed by Pride."People Are Furious After Toronto Pride Tried To Trademark "Dyke March" And "Trans* Pride". BuzzFeed, July 20, 2015.
Queers Against Israeli Apartheid In 2010 there was a controversy over Pride Toronto's decisions regarding the participation of the group, Queers Against Israeli Apartheid (QuAIA). Initially, Pride Toronto agreed not to allow the phrase "Israeli Apartheid" as part of a deal with the City of Toronto (which had suggested that funding would be reviewed if the group was included). However, Pride Toronto subsequently reversed that decision June 23 (after it had received the funds from the city), allowing the group to participate. Several Pro-Israel groups also attended the event.Free speech at Pride: All of our coverage in one place at Xtra.ca.Pride Toronto lays off staff, anticipates $250K loss by Marcus McCann, Xtra, July 15, 2010.
Pride Week's decision to reverse the ban on QuAIA after it had received funding from the city (which was done on the condition that QuAIA not be allowed to participate) drew sharp criticism from several sources. Rob Ford, who was then a mayoral candidate (he was subsequently elected several months later), stated that: "I want to express my disappointment and disgust with Pride Toronto's decision to allow this hateful group to march." Giorgio Mammoliti, who was also running for mayor, announced that he would introduce a motion at the city council demanding that Pride return the $250,000 it had received from the city to reject all of Pride's future funding requests.Jewish groups decry Pride's Israeli decision, CBC.ca, Friday, June 25, 2010. In an editorial, the National Post called for both the City of Toronto and corporate sponsors to halt all funding to Pride Week, arguing that: "Anti-Israel bigots are free to have their own parade – but not on the public dime. The City of Toronto, whose councilors already have explicitly denounced QuAIA's "apartheid" propaganda, should prepare to cut funding. Corporate sponsors should do likewise."National Post editorial: Corporate sponsors should walk away from Toronto's Pride parade by Jonathan Kay, National Post, June 23, 2010.
In March 2011, Toronto mayor Rob Ford said that he would not allow city funding for the 2011 Toronto Pride Parade if organizers allowed QuAIA to march again this year. "Taxpayers dollars should not go toward funding hate speech", Ford said.Toronto mayor lays down Pride parade law. Canadian Jewish News, March 10, 2011. However, on April 13, 2011, the non-partisan Toronto city manager released a report for the city council's executive committee concluding that "the participation of QUAIA in the Pride Parade based solely on the phrase 'Israeli Apartheid' does not violate the City's Anti-Discrimination Policy. The City also cannot therefore conclude that the use of term on signs or banners to identify QuAIA constitutes the promotion of hatred or seeks to incite discrimination contrary to the Code."Report from the City Manager: Compliance with the City of Toronto's Anti-Discrimination Policy - Pride Toronto. City of Toronto. Ford indicated that he planned to defund the parade regardless of the city manager's report.Phrase 'Israeli apartheid' not discriminatory: city manager. Toronto Star, April 13, 2011. On April 15, 2011, QuAIA announced that it would withdraw from the 2011 Pride parade; however, councillor Giorgio Mammoliti responded that he would still introduce a motion to withdraw city funding from Pride Toronto if the committee did not explicitly ban the group from participating."Councillor demands Pride promise to ban Queers Against Israeli Apartheid". Toronto Star, April 15, 2011.
In June 2012, the Toronto city council voted to condemn the phrase "Israeli apartheid" as part of a resolution recognizing the Pride parade as a "significant cultural event that strongly promotes the ideals of tolerance and diversity". The resolution condemned the term "Israeli apartheid" for undermining the values of Pride and diminishing "the suffering experienced by individuals during the apartheid regime in South Africa". Council votes to condemn use of term 'Israeli apartheid'. Toronto Sun, June 7, 2012.
Black Lives Matter At the 2016 parade, the Toronto chapter of Black Lives Matter, who had been selected by Pride as the honoured group, interrupted the parade for approximately half an hour to call attention to a number of demands addressing racism in the LGBTQ community."Black Lives Matter versus Pride Toronto". Now, July 12, 2016. The demands included Pride providing stable funding and space to events for LGBTQ people of colour such as Blockorama, Black Queer Youth and the South Asian stage,"Black Lives Matter protests at Toronto Pride Parade". BlogTO, July 3, 2016. which had seen funding cuts and repeated relocation to less convenient or suitable venues in recent years, as well as increasing diversity in the hiring of the organization's staff and board — however, media coverage focused primarily on one explosive demand: that Toronto Police officers be barred from participating in Pride while in uniform, in response to ongoing police harassment of people of colour and transgender people.
Executive director Mathieu Chantelois signed BLM's statement of demand, but later asserted that he had signed it only to end the sit-in and get the parade moving, and had not agreed to honour the demands."Pride organizer says he has not agreed to exclude police floats from parade". CP24, July 4, 2016. Following criticism of his handling of the incident, he resigned as executive director of Pride approximately six weeks later on August 11."Executive director of Pride Toronto resigns". Toronto Star, August 10, 2016.
Debate over the action focused primarily on the question of whether banning uniformed police from the parade represented an abdication of the organization's stated values of diversity and inclusivity,"Toronto mayor speaks out for police inclusion after Pride protest". CBC News, July 6, 2016. largely without regard to the matter of whether not honouring the demand, thereby alienating racialized and transgender members of the community, would also be an abdication of those same values."How did CBC Radio's Black Lives Matter versus Pride funding coverage go so wrong?". Now, June 6, 2017. Some media analysts claimed that BLM was an outside group with no connection to LGBTQ issues at all, and thus should not have been invited to participate in the first place, even though all of the demands related directly to Pride's handling of transgender and racial issues, and BLM leaders Janaya Khan and Syrus Marcus Ware are both queer-identified."Exclusive: Black Lives Matter Toronto co-founder responds to Pride action criticism". Now, July 6, 2016. Pride staff have reaffirmed on more than one occasion that police were not barred from participating in the parade at all, but were simply being directed not to march in uniform."Pride Toronto says police welcome without 'uniform, weapons or vehicles'". BreakfastTelevision, May 8, 2017.
At Pride's general meeting in January 2017, the organization's members voted to affirm the motion that police not be permitted to march in uniform."Pride Toronto AGM vote reaffirms Black Lives Matter request for no police floats at parade". CBC Toronto, January 18, 2017. Some opponents of the motion have falsely claimed that the meeting, and the resulting discussion about the police motion, were conducted in secret even though the meeting was scheduled and advertised normally and widely publicized by the media."'Enough is enough:' Pride Toronto board member explains decision to ban police from parade". CBC News, January 23, 2017.