Ractopamine () is an animal feed additive used to promote leanness and increase food conversion efficiency in farmed animals in few countries, banned in most. Pharmacologically, it is a phenol-based TAAR1 agonist and β adrenoreceptor agonist that stimulates β1 and β2 adrenergic receptors. It is most commonly administered to animals for meat production as ractopamine hydrochloride. It is the active ingredient in products marketed in the US as Paylean for swine, Optaflexx for cattle, and Topmax for turkeys. It was developed by Elanco Animal Health, a former division of Eli Lilly and Company.
As of 2025, the use of ractopamine "is banned or its use restricted in 168 nations", including the European Union, China and Russia, while it is legal in some other countries, with differing maximum residual limits (MRLs) in meat. Examples include the United States (50 ppb in pork, 30 ppb in beef); Japan, Taiwan and South Korea (10 ppb, in accordance with the Codex Alimentarius Commission); and New Zealand (0.1 ppb).
Commercial ractopamine is a mixture of all four possible stereoisomers. It is also a positional isomer of dobutamine, a related drug.
Mode of action When used as a food additive, ractopamine added to feed can be distributed by the blood to the muscle tissues, where it serves as a full agonist to murine (mouse or rat) TAAR1, a receptor protein (not necessarily in humans). It is also an agonist to beta-adrenergic receptors and a dopamine releasing agent. A cascade of events will then be initiated to increase protein synthesis, which results in increased muscle fiber size. Ractopamine is known to increase the rate of weight gain, improve feed efficiency, and increase carcass leanness in finishing swine. Its use in finishing swine yields about of additional lean pork per animal, and improves feed efficiency by 10%. In cattle on 28 January 2004 Elanco Animal Health made Optaflexx commercially available in the US. Optaflexx is a "medicated feed additive that is labeled only for use in steers or market heifers (not breeding heifers or bulls) during the last 28–42 days on feed."
Regulation around the world On 6 July 2012, the international reference standard Codex Alimentarius Commission narrowly approved the adoption of a maximum residue limit (MRL) of 10 parts per billion (ppb) for muscle cuts of beef and pork. Setting any limit was a controversial move. Countries with major meat export markets had been lobbying for the establishment of such a standard for several years to use it as leverage to erode individual national-level bans in World Trade Organization disputes. Consumers International, a world federation of consumer groups that represents 220 consumer organizations in 115 countries, strongly opposed the move.
A 2020 petition to the Food and Drug Administration to reconsider the approval of ractopamine stated that 168 other nations had banned or restricted its use. In 2025 and in response to an unreasonable delay lawsuit, the FDA responded acknowledging the number had increased from 160 in 2012, and questioned the relevance of the figure.
European Union Ractopamine has not been allowed in the European Union, based on the 2009 EU's Food Safety Authority's opinion on its safety evaluation, which concluded that available data were insufficient to derive a maximum residue limit as a 'safe residue level for human consumption'. The uncertainty was particularly great for people who might be thought to be more susceptible than most to an increase in β adrenergic stimulation from consuming the additive, such as children or people with cardiovascular disease, and that simply increasing the "uncertainty factor" built into the calculation as a safety factor would rapidly become arbitrary.
Canada, United States, Mexico Ractopamine use as a feed additive is authorized in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. In the US, ractopamine is allowed to be used at a feed concentration of 5–20 mg/kg feed for finishing pigs and in dosages of 5–10 mg/kg feed for finishing pigs heavier than 109 kg. The maximum residue limit for ractopamine for meat in the US is 50 parts per billion (ppb), or five times the standard set by the Codex Alimentarius. Ractopamine was approved by the FDA in 1999 for use in swine, in 2003 for use in cattle, and in 2008 for use in turkeys.
In 2015, the USDA approved of a new label, "No ractopamine — a beta-agonist growth promotant" to be used.
The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) maintains the Canadian Ractopamine-Free Pork Certification Program (CRFPCP) so that Canadian exports to Asian countries are not disallowed by their authorities. Hundreds of commercial feed facilities, including some from overseas, are enrolled in the CRFPCP, a programme that is essentially based on self-certification and backed up by a randomized testing policy.
Currently, the label for USDA organic means no synthetic compounds can be used other than those on the list of allowed synthetics; therefore, ractopamine would not be allowed in certified organic production.
For Canadian domestic consumption of non-CRFPCP pork, ractopamine hydrochloride is permitted to be sold over the counter with applications in meal or pellet feed for finishing barrows and gilts (up to 10 mg/kg for last six weeks), confined finishing cattle (up to 30 mg/kg for last 42 days), and finishing heavy turkeys (up to 9 mg/kg for 14 days). The withdrawal period was set to 0 days.
Japan, South Korea Japan, which had permitted its feed additive use at least until 2009, and South Korea only allow import of meat with ractopamine residues up to the maximum residue limit (MRL), but do not permit its use in beef production.
Taiwan In October 2006, Taiwan banned ractopamine along with other beta-adrenergic agonists. In a 2012 climb-down, its legislature passed amendments to its Act Governing Food Sanitation, authorising government agencies to set safety standards for ractopamine. The Taiwanese Department of Health ultimately established an MRL of 10 ppb for ractopamine in beef on 31 July 2012. The American Institute in Taiwan, which represents US interests in Taiwan, states that these "and many other countries have determined that meat from animals fed ractopamine is safe for human consumption"; this is in the context of an ongoing trade dispute between Taiwan and the US on this subject, which threatened to prevent Taiwan's entry to the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade pact.
In 2020, restrictions on imports of US pork with ractopamine were relaxed, leading to protests. A referendum took place on December 18, 2021, deciding whether to ban the import of pork with ractopamine, and the ban was rejected.
China, Russia In 2013, Russia and China banned ractopamine in pork, s.a. Smithfield Foods and Russia also in beef, deeming it unfit for human consumption. Because the traditional Chinese diet embraces pig offal, and because ractopamine is concentrated by the gastro-intestinal system of animals, Chinese officials have banned ractopamine. Other countries in Asia, whose traditional diet is similar to that of the Chinese, have had similar concerns, but the American use of tied trade access as a proxy for conflict has somewhat mitigated their reactions.
New Zealand, Russia In 2017, Russia banned imports of beef from New Zealand after finding ractopamine in New Zealand beef. Ractopamine is not registered for use in cattle in New Zealand.
WADA proscription In 2015, Radwa Arafa Abd Elsalam, an athlete from Egypt, underwent a doping control where ractopamine was identified in the sample. Elsalam was sanctioned by the Egyptian Anti-Doping Organisation (EGY-NADO) with a two year ineligibility period for non-intentional presence of a prohibited substance, in violation of Article 2.1 of the EGY-NADO rules. While not mentioned by name in the 2015 Prohibited List, ractopamine was determined to — much like clenbuterol, another β2-adrenergic agonist — constitute an Other Anabolic Agent prohibited under S1.2. Elsalam appealed the decision, claiming that ractopamine is used in the meat industry overseas, so she must have inadvertently consumed food contaminated with ractopamine. EGY-NADO accepted her appeal, reduced the sanction to six months, and provided the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) with records pertaining to the case.
WADA filed an appeal with the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) against EGY-NADO and Elsalam with respect to the appealed decision. WADA asserted ractopamine was "undisputed[ly]" an Other Anabolic Agent, that "[i]t is not sufficient for an athlete merely to make protestations of innocence and suggest that the prohibited substance must have entered her body in inadvertently", and that "her explanations are nothing more than mere speculation". Elsalam asserted she was not aware ractopamine was a prohibited substance, that ractopamine was commonly used overseas to increase meat yields, that she was "a normal Arabic girl", that her family consumed a large quantity of meat during Ramadan (providing a receipt "for the purchase of 20 kilos of Brazilian meat, hot dog and green sausage"), that she was not warned meat could contain prohibited substances, and that further sanctions were "unfair" and "will affect her whole life causing her depression".
CAS determined there were two key issues in dispute: Firstly, whether the presence of ractopamine in the athlete's sample constituted a violation of EGY-NADO rules; and secondly, if a violation was committed, the extent to which sanctions should be applied. On the first issue, CAS found "there can be no doubt that Ractopamine is indeed a non-specified substance falling under the category of Other Anabolic Agents" and that no evidence was submitted to suggest otherwise. On the second issue, CAS stated they could not "permit an athlete to establish how a substance came to be present in his body by little more a denial that he took it", that there was "nothing more than speculation, unsupported by any evidence of any kind", that Elsalam did not substantiate her hypothesis with any evidence aside from the receipt presented, that little attempt was made "to establish the causal link" and that it was "noteworthy" that Elsalam had not "produced a single piece of evidence demonstrating or even substantiating that other consumers (including athletes) having purchased and eating meat in Egypt within the relevant time have been subjected to food contamination with [ractopamine]"
CAS upheld WADA's appeal, ruling a violation was committed, and that Elsalam had not met her burden of proof, so the violation "must be deemed to have been intentional". It was explicitly stated that they had "not pronounced the Athlete as a 'cheater'". Elsalam's ineligibility period was extended to four years.
In October 2017 at a WADA conference, it was suggested in relation with ractopamine: that scientific solutions could "allow discrimination between meat contamination and pharmacological intake"; "Information on risk of meat contamination should be continued"; "Countries affected by meat contamination should continue their efforts, in particular sanitary measures, to reduce risks of exposure of the national and international athletic population."
One conclusion reached in October 2017 was that there was a "clear risk for athletes to be tested positive" when consuming meat with residues at the MRL concentration.
International disputes US-EU WTO dispute