Section 15.11 is a provision in the Ohio Constitution that makes it unconstitutional for the state to recognize or perform same-sex marriages or civil unions.Official Ballot Language , Ohio Secretary of State. Accessed 21 December 2006. Approved as a constitutional amendment in 2004 under the name of "Issue One", it received support from 61.7% of voters.CNN.com Election 2004 - Ballot Measures Accessed 30 November 2006.
The text of the amendment states: Only a union between one man and one woman may be a marriage valid in or recognized by this state and its political subdivisions. This state and its political subdivisions shall not create or recognize a legal status for relationships of unmarried individuals that intends to approximate the design, qualities, significance or effect of marriage.Ohio Constitution, Article XV, section 11. Accessed 21 December 2006.
The LGBT rights organization Equality Ohio was founded in response to the passage of Issue 1.
Many political experts credit the amendment with bolstering turnout in rural Ohio, leading to many religious supporters of President George W. Bush to turnout to the polls, helping him win the state of Ohio by a narrow 2 point margin.
Results
County breakdown +Breakdown of voting by county County Yes Votes No VotesAdams75.34%8,70024.66%2,847Allen71.04%33,76528.96%13,764Ashland70.48% 17,44729.52%7,307Ashtabula61.10%27,13338.90%17,275Athens44.22%12,81655.78%16,166Auglaize75.18%17,05124.82%5,628Belmont72.32%23,52127.68%9,002Brown74.12%14,39425.88%5,026Butler68.08%109,77931.92%51,462Carroll70.75%9,82229.25%4,060Champaign70.17%12,91529.83%5,491Clark63.88%42,66136.12%24,126Clermont68.21%58,17231.79%27,108Clinton71.65%12,79128.35%5,062Columbiana70.14%33,97029.86%14,465Coshocton69.78%11,69330.22%5,063Crawford70.92%15,19729.08%6,232Cuyahoga53.26%335,67846.74%294,569Darke72.93%18,80327.07%6,980Defiance72.40%13,04827.60%4,975Delaware62.19%48,84437.81%29,696Erie63.59%24,46636.41%14,007Fairfield68.02%45,42331.98%21,352Fayette74.83%8,54425.17%2,874Franklin51.99%248,87348.01%229,841Fulton71.77%15,04128.23%5,917Gallia79.76%10,89720.24%2,766Geauga59.93%29,36040.07%19,630Greene62.04%48,10037.96%29,430Guernsey69.23%11,78130.77%5,237Hamilton56.30%229,11843.70%177,850Hancock72.46%24,78727.54%9,422Hardin74.49%9,71025.51%3,325Harrison69.67%5,56630.33%2,423Henry73.63%10,83426.37%3,881Highland76.61%13,81923.39%4,219Hocking69.99%8,93530.01%3,832Holmes76.54%8,52523.46%2,613Huron68.69%17,18031.31%7,831Jackson74.98%10,33225.02%3,448Jefferson72.41%25,72627.59%9,801Knox68.19%17,81531.81%8,310Lake57.63%65,01242.37%47,796Lawrence79.44%21,15520.56%5,474Licking66.28%51,61233.72%26,262Logan72%15,11228%5,878Lorain58.90%80,12441.10%55,900Lucas57.61%119,91642.39%88,227Madison70%12,00330%5,144Mahoning62.95%81,46937.05%47,951Marion67.91%19,37432.09%9,157Medina61.56%50,65538.44%31,629Meigs75.15%7,86124.85%2,600Mercer77.05%15,77722.95%4,698Miami67.77%33,64132.23%15,998Monroe74.29%5,65125.71%1,956Montgomery58.19%158,63941.81%113,969Morgan71.80%4,70828.20%1,849Morrow71.33%11,50028.67%4,622Muskingum67.44%25,46432.56%12,294Noble71.24%4,59228.76%1,854Ottawa63.81%14,42936.19%8,182Paulding74.15%7,21825.85%2,516Perry71.13%10,56728.87%4,288Pickaway70.57%15,67029.43%6,534Pike74.57%9,06925.43%3,092Portage57.52%42,82842.48%31,626Preble70.81%14,59329.19%6,015Putnam77.67%14,31722.33%4,117Richland68.16%41,25431.84%19,274Ross68.66%20,77431.34%9,483Sandusky67.14%19,07732.86%9,336Scioto76.70%26,40123.30%8,018Seneca66.05%17,37733.95%8,931Shelby73.45%16,44526.55%5,943Stark64.18%118,80935.82%66,302Summit57.87%153,89442.13%112,045Trumbull61.88%64,82338.12%39,933Tuscarawas65.93%27,62334.07%14,274Union70.58%15,68329.42%6,536Van Wert75.14%11,26124.86%3,726Vinton68.59%4,01031.41%1,836Warren69.41%63,43130.59%27,960Washington72.27%20,94027.73%8,036Wayne66.91%33,96733.09%16,798Williams72.56%13,27527.44%5,019Wood59.36%36,53040.64%25,014Wyandot71.77%7,77328.23%3,057
References
External links The Money Behind the 2004 Marriage Amendments -- National Institute on Money in State Politics